Back to @DailyMailUK's profile

Mail+ engagement report

@DailyMailUK - 803K followers on X

Measured over 104 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 803K followers
Per impression
0.041%
7.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 104 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.916% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 104 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 2053x its own typical post.

Measured over 104 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mail+'s engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Mail+ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 207 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 7, 20242053x their median

    ‘If Keir Starmer really wins this election he will take us back into the Customs Union and the Single Market. Starmer’s plan is to make us the punk of Brussels’ 🗣️ Boris Johnson issues stark warning over Keir Starmer Read his full explosive column: https://t.co/QuqvFPc08q https://t.co/1qbKrhWMmK

    1.6K7743.1K6821.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202693x their median

    The King has slapped down Harry and Meghan... but this is the biggest revelation from his public letter. Finally, someone's put them in their place: SARAH VINE https://t.co/TgvMQqhOLu

    256716023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202662x their median

    JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan remain imbued with a mutual god complex to deliver us from evil and make the world a better place... chiefly for themselves https://t.co/gaiZUsxoZm

    1531814114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202649x their median

    AMANDA PLATELL: Harry's 'at home' and the children are in UK schools, but Meghan's drive and ambition will keep her flitting back and forth to California... I just hope she doesn't forget a video call isn't the same as mum's loving arms https://t.co/rT5AM9jPpS

    51392120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202631x their median

    AMANDA PLATELL: Everyone has missed the appallingly selfish truth about Harry and Meghan's return. I fear for the future https://t.co/mb8tCADtn3

    57928021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202622x their median

    ROBERT HARDMAN: This is not a happy ever after - and there are still bumps in the long road ahead. But a divided royal house is a diminished royal house. Divisions remain - but as of today, those gaps have narrowed a little https://t.co/6yF2DJYVpV

    16447012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202617x their median

    ANDREW LOWNIE: The question is no longer how the monarchy deals with its bad apples, but whether it can survive so many of them https://t.co/VU98WLqBXg

    3231519.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202615x their median

    Decoding the King's striking declaration on Harry and Meghan... and why royal insiders tell me they are already 'exasperated' by couple's behaviour since returning to Britain: RICHARD KAY https://t.co/9AnqnEMJKV

    29313013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202615x their median

    SARAH VINE: Sorry, Meghan, there's a new Fab Four now... and I wouldn't want to be in your shoes facing them across the Damask in the drawing room at Balmoral https://t.co/Lb0OTJh80t

    26315124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202614x their median

    Meghan's demands for her new home revealed... and why Harry had 'no life' in California: Insiders tell ALISON BOSHOFF exactly what couple want from return to Britain - and reveal how extremely wealthy friend is supporting them https://t.co/OaLtunhDUq

    8133012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 104 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.916% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 104 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 2053x its own typical post.

What is Mail+'s engagement rate on X?
Mail+ (@DailyMailUK) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 104 original posts from the last 30 days against 803,352 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Mail+ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DailyMailUK have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DailyMailUK post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going