Back to @DailyMailUK's profile

Mail+ engagement report

@DailyMailUK - 803K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 803K followers
Per impression
0.041%
8.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 1530x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mail+'s engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Mail+ sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 7, 20241530x their median

    ‘If Keir Starmer really wins this election he will take us back into the Customs Union and the Single Market. Starmer’s plan is to make us the punk of Brussels’ 🗣️ Boris Johnson issues stark warning over Keir Starmer Read his full explosive column: https://t.co/QuqvFPc08q https://t.co/1qbKrhWMmK

    1.6K7403.1K6821.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202647x their median

    JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan remain imbued with a mutual god complex to deliver us from evil and make the world a better place... chiefly for themselves https://t.co/gaiZUsxoZm

    1531814114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202637x their median

    AMANDA PLATELL: Harry's 'at home' and the children are in UK schools, but Meghan's drive and ambition will keep her flitting back and forth to California... I just hope she doesn't forget a video call isn't the same as mum's loving arms https://t.co/rT5AM9jPpS

    51392120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202624x their median

    AMANDA PLATELL: Everyone has missed the appallingly selfish truth about Harry and Meghan's return. I fear for the future https://t.co/mb8tCADtn3

    57928021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202617x their median

    ROBERT HARDMAN: This is not a happy ever after - and there are still bumps in the long road ahead. But a divided royal house is a diminished royal house. Divisions remain - but as of today, those gaps have narrowed a little https://t.co/6yF2DJYVpV

    16447012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202613x their median

    ANDREW LOWNIE: The question is no longer how the monarchy deals with its bad apples, but whether it can survive so many of them https://t.co/VU98WLqBXg

    3231519.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    SARAH VINE: Sorry, Meghan, there's a new Fab Four now... and I wouldn't want to be in your shoes facing them across the Damask in the drawing room at Balmoral https://t.co/Lb0OTJh80t

    26315124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202611x their median

    Meghan's demands for her new home revealed... and why Harry had 'no life' in California: Insiders tell ALISON BOSHOFF exactly what couple want from return to Britain - and reveal how extremely wealthy friend is supporting them https://t.co/OaLtunhDUq

    8133012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.8x their median

    'I wonder which billionaire will pay their bills now': The signs that Meghan and Harry aren't as rich as they seem as insiders tell ALISON BOSHOFF about expensive hunt for a 'forever home'... and how much they really made in US https://t.co/NYdryKlvhw

    11317011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.8x their median

    CLARE FOGES: The unhinged Sudanese asylum seeker who brutally stabbed an innocent woman 30 times should never have been allowed on our streets. This is the question all women across Britain are now asking https://t.co/jniOvuF0n3

    153508.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 803K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 1530x its own typical post.

What is Mail+'s engagement rate on X?
Mail+ (@DailyMailUK) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 803,149 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Mail+ sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DailyMailUK have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DailyMailUK post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going