Back to @DPhotographer's profile

Digital Photographer Magazine engagement report

@DPhotographer - 304K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 304K followers
Per impression
0.167%
599 views on a typical post
Reach
0.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 599 times each, and 0.167% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.197% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Digital Photographer Magazine's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Digital Photographer Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 146 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202622x their median

    Firmware updates mean modern mirrorless cameras change over time, and Nikon is particularly adept at providing long-term support https://t.co/0xhdf7nibH

    220001.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202616x their median

    The Canon EOS R8 Mark II is Canon's lightest full-frame camera with IBIS, and along with a subtle nod to the 1980s, brings some notable design improvements https://t.co/YQyZIgUFWf

    150101.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202614x their median

    Panasonic completes a new kind of ‘trinity’, now offering a trio of very different L-mount lenses that are all virtually identical in size and weight https://t.co/T9giUxAMJT

    121011.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202613x their median

    The Panasonic Lumix S 20mm f/2.5 follows in the virtually identically sized footprints of its sibling S 40mm, but with a truly expansive field of view https://t.co/HeAW5zOdDA

    121001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202612x their median

    The Canon EOS R8 Mark II continues the well-loved features from the original while fixing some of the biggest annoyances https://t.co/d9njYxsAB9

    101101.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.0x their median

    The Camp Snap 110D brings a 1970s look to the popular screen-free camera – along with the fastest shutter yet https://t.co/b7J7P2lZhB

    61011.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20267.0x their median

    Time Magazine has named the Nikon ZR one of the best inventions of 2026 https://t.co/qHKG5KMVPx

    7000923 viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.0x their median

    Don't call it a retro camera –the Canon EOS R8 Mark II is a heritage camera, inspired by 35mm icons like the Canon T80 https://t.co/lUpHskfOR2

    52001.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.0x their median

    The new Fujifilm XF 400mm f/4.5 f/4.5 R LM OIS WR finally gives Fujifilm photographers a native prime telephoto between the 200mm and 500mm https://t.co/vQxBQ8UgKz

    70001.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.0x their median

    As habitat loss and climate change threaten birds and wildlife, photographers across the Americas capture the urgent story of conservation – and the fight to protect the places birds call home https://t.co/c8eNqnzMpc

    61002.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 599 times each, and 0.167% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.197% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Digital Photographer Magazine's engagement rate on X?
Digital Photographer Magazine (@DPhotographer) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 303,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Digital Photographer Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DPhotographer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DPhotographer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going