Back to @DGoobal's profile

Dima Glooobal engagement report

@DGoobal - 689K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.09%
of 689K followers
Per impression
3.31%
224K views on a typical post
Reach
32.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.964%
2.2K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 689K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 224K times each, and 3.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 214K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dima Glooobal's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.09%, Dima Glooobal sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202329x their median

    Amazing fuck with @KarimYoavXXX He’s super good with it 🍓 https://t.co/u3XkKQ4XsX https://t.co/m2DmEtcJeV

    178K36K52326918M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.1x their median

    This dude came by for a morning blowjob before work https://t.co/vzPdAzK1d1

    27K3.4K347790K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.2x their median

    Have you ever had sex with random boy? Tell me your story 🕵🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/T84yWZSt24

    15K1.3K192419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.6x their median

    PARIS SEX VLOG 🇫🇷 A few days in Paris — late-night walks, beautiful streets, little cafés, unexpected moments, and plenty of time to simply get lost in the city. Come along for a glimpse into my Paris trip, from the first morning to the last night. https://t.co/hhw5bFpBGP

    11K1.5K145328K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    I’ll lick every last drop off your dick until there’s absolutely nothing left https://t.co/QrIiIXiq2v

    9.2K1.3K186215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    HARDCORE THREESOME A full behind-the-scenes look at the filming, with plenty of action along the way. Spending the day with these two guys was an unforgettable experience. 1 HOUR VIDEO Guys in the video: @hiusqx @etraskori https://t.co/ksxbNBXaBJ

    9.0K1.2K142337K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Serving a straight Arab guy https://t.co/kT0brX7uQD

    8.4K1.2K2112232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    I’ll leave this here, and you can decide what to do with it https://t.co/OXXxeNW91c

    7.0K740122318K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    SENSITIVE CONTENT 📍 https://t.co/q8O91Y6Fto

    6.3K486560232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    I’m sharing my full sex vlog with you. The sex scenes have been cut, so this version only includes previews. The complete uncensored version — including anal scenes and the ending — is available where you already know. Full runtime (uncut): 1 hour https://t.co/TLK03YSGZ4

    4.3K936100248K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 689K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 224K times each, and 3.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 214K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

What is Dima Glooobal's engagement rate on X?
Dima Glooobal (@DGoobal) has an engagement rate of 1.09%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 688,973 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.09%, Dima Glooobal sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DGoobal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DGoobal post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going