金土哥Degen🧲💹 engagement report
@DGHUBCrypto - 193K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.395% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 109 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
金土哥Degen🧲💹's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, 金土哥Degen🧲💹 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 593 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 14, 20263.6x their median
如果说 Launchpad 的竞争正在越来越激烈，那么真正能够让用户记住的，必然是那些拥有独特机制的项目。 $EMBER 就是一个值得关注的名字。@embercurve EMBER 正在打造一个融合 Launchpad、DAO 以及类似股票交易机制的新型生态，让项目创作者与社区用户都能够拥有更多参与空间。但真正让我眼前一亮的，是它围绕创作者和用户设计的激励机制。 平台每日产生的费用中，80% 分配给创作者，20% 留在平台生态。这种设计让创作者不再只是单纯发布项目，而是能够真正参与生态价值的形成。 而每日奖金池，则进一步增强了整个系统的互动性。随着参与者不断增加，更多创作者进入，更多项目上线，平台活跃度也有机会形成持续的正向循环。这也是 EMBER 最值得关注的地方。 它并不只是想做一个普通的 Launchpad，而是在尝试建立一个由项目、创作者、用户和 DAO共同推动的生态。Launchpad 从来不缺，但真正能够让参与者持续留下来的平台，需要更强的机制、更好的激励，以及足够有吸引力的社区文化。 EMBER 目前还处于早期阶段，但正因为如此，它未来生态能够发展到什么程度，反而更值得期待。机制是基础，创作者是核心，社区才是让生态真正燃烧起来的力量。而 EMBER，正在点燃这把火。 CA：5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6
- Sep 7, 20263.3x their median
solana:9uT7rob8TKKnzvxqkD5nj9UMw16ZPJByEW37pMcHpump 正在成为 Robinhood Chain 上值得重点关注的 Stock Meme 之一。@iCoinRH 在近期越来越火热的股票配对 Meme 赛道中，ICOIN 的定位非常鲜明。它与 AAPL 叙事结合，不仅拥有天然的市场认知度，也让整个 Meme 故事更容易被理解和传播。 更重要的是，ICOIN 并不只是依靠概念吸引注意力。活跃社区 + 稳定持有者 + 持续产出内容的团队 这几个优势正在逐渐形成合力。一个真正有生命力的 Meme，最重要的从来不是短期噱头，而是社区能否持续创造热度，团队能否持续推动项目发展。 如果 Stock Meme 继续成为 Robinhood Chain 的热门赛道，ICOIN 凭借自身独特的 AAPL 配对叙事，有机会进一步提升市场辨识度，甚至成为这个新兴类别中值得关注的代表项目。 赛道正在升温，ICOIN 也正在蓄力。别轻易忽视这个正在成长的 AAPL Meme。 CA：0x5d6EF090a1461B11c9427aC319260122D1C61e18
- Sep 9, 20263.1x their median
如果一个 Meme 在经历强势上涨之后，依然能够稳住高位并持续吸引买盘，那么它的市场韧性就值得关注。ZZZ 最近的表现正展现出这样的特点。 前期上涨之后，ZZZ 并没有快速失去热度，而是逐渐进入高位整理。期间虽然出现多次回调，但每一次下探都能看到一定承接，说明市场关注度和买方力量依然存在。 更值得注意的是，经过这一轮换手之后，ZZZ 正逐渐形成新的价格结构。近期几次向上尝试，也让市场重新看到突破的可能。 对于 Meme 项目来说，真正有吸引力的并不是一次突然拉升，而是上涨之后依然能够保持活跃，并让社区和资金继续围绕项目形成共识。如果后续买盘再次增强，同时成交量配合放大，ZZZ 或许有机会突破当前整理区间，再次挑战前方高位。 现在的 ZZZ 更像是在蓄力，而不是结束。高位有承接，市场有关注，突破方向正在逐渐变得清晰。如果下一次放量突破出现，ZZZ 或许会成为市场再次聚焦的名字。 CA: 0x7dbf38976f6D3b9c529e7D9484A71898B409eE6a
- Sep 10, 20263.1x their median
$PENPE 刚刚在 Robinhood 上线了 $AAPL 交易对。🍎🔥 0xb83fc6010c8dcf628abe787a161c619fcc543117 https://t.co/mWoVL3AztD
- Sep 9, 20263.0x their median
如果一个 Meme 能在市场热点不断更替之后，依然重新吸引目光，那么它的价值就不只是一次行情。GOOD 正在展现这种属于 OG 的韧性。@GoodCoinRH 我之前已经关注过 GOOD，而最近再次观察它，最大的感受就是：这个项目的品牌记忆点依然非常强。 在 Meme 市场，新的叙事每天都在出现，但真正能够留下印象的项目并不多。GOOD 的优势恰恰在于它足够简单、足够直接，同时又拥有非常容易传播的品牌属性。 “GOOD”本身就是一个天然具有情绪价值的名字。它不需要复杂解释，也不需要堆叠太多概念。一个简单的词，就能够让社区围绕它创造内容、表达态度，并逐渐形成属于自己的 Meme 文化。 更重要的是，GOOD 正在重新获得市场关注。对于一个已经经历过市场周期的项目来说，能够再次进入讨论范围，本身就是一种很有意思的信号。 我更看重的并不是某一次短线拉升，而是 GOOD 能否借助这次重新获得的注意力，把品牌影响力、社区活跃度和市场共识进一步放大。 如果后续社区继续扩张，内容持续增加，市场讨论度不断提升，那么 GOOD 完全有机会从一个熟悉的 OG Meme，重新成长为 Robinhood Chain 上更具代表性的社区品牌。 Meme 的热点会轮换，但真正容易被记住的名字不会轻易消失。GOOD 现在做的，不只是回到市场视野。更像是在告诉大家：OG 仍然有机会重新点燃。 CA: 0x5f62C57e5C537887117EeF828b7E3Ad41C009FEb
- Sep 5, 20262.9x their median
$SIRIUS 最近的走势再次变得非常有看点。@DogestarOnRH 经历前期强势上涨和高位震荡后，SIRIUS 并没有因为回调而彻底失去市场关注，反而在整理之后重新出现明显的买盘承接，价格再次向关键压力区域发起挑战。 这也是我比较关注 SIRIUS 的原因之一。每一次回调之后都能看到资金重新尝试入场，说明市场对这个项目的兴趣依然存在。如今价格重新回到重要位置，多空双方正在展开新一轮博弈。 如果后续买盘进一步增强，并配合成交活跃度提升，SIRIUS 一旦突破前方压力，市场情绪或许会再次被点燃。 对于 Meme 来说，能够经历上涨、调整，再重新聚集市场注意力，本身就是一个值得关注的信号。SIRIUS 目前正站在一个关键节点。压力正在测试，买盘正在回归，下一步走势值得重点关注。 CA：0x3b4A0048a00787A644932cD648Faa043410C163e
- Sep 8, 20262.6x their median
如果说 Robinhood Chain 正在把传统金融资产带上链，那么 $DENAR 正在尝试解决一个更重要的问题：当这些资产真正进入链上之后，流动性和信用市场应该如何建立？@DenarMarkets 这也是我持续关注 DENAR 的原因。DENAR 并不是简单围绕 RWA 做一个概念，而是在尝试构建一套围绕代币化资产运行的借贷基础设施。用户可以将 NVDA、AAPL、MSFT、TSLA 等代币化资产作为抵押，在不出售底层资产的情况下获得 USDG 流动性。 这意味着，RWA 不再只是“被代币化然后持有”，而是开始真正参与链上金融活动。更让我感兴趣的是 DENAR 的整体架构。 基于 Morpho Blue 的借贷框架、Chainlink 的价格数据以及独立市场设计，让不同资产之间能够保持更加清晰的风险隔离。与此同时，治理机制也让 DENAR 持有者能够参与决定哪些 Robinhood Chain 资产进入借贷市场。 这套设计真正有想象力的地方在于：资产可以成为抵押品，抵押品可以产生流动性，流动性又能够进一步推动链上金融市场的发展。而随着更多优质代币化资产进入生态，DENAR 所能够承载的金融场景也可能不断扩大。 再加上 dUSD、sdUSD 以及基于代币化 SGOV 的收益结构，DENAR 正在尝试把抵押、借贷、稳定资产和收益连接到同一套 RWA 基础设施之中。我认为，这也是 DENAR 与普通 RWA Meme 或单一叙事项目最大的区别。它真正瞄准的，是RWA 背后的金融基础设施。 Robinhood Chain 负责把资产带到链上，而 DENAR 正在尝试让这些资产拥有更完整的金融属性。如果未来流动性、抵押资产规模和借贷市场能够持续扩张，DENAR 有机会成为 Robinhood Chain RWA 生态中非常重要的一层。 项目仍在早期，但正因为如此，现在反而是观察它如何一步步建立金融基础设施的有趣阶段。RWA 正在上链，而 DENAR 想做的，是让这些资产真正“活起来”。 CA: 0x3786728a2c49C4617Bf4FE5BD82b90B6B0dF5508
- Aug 26, 20262.5x their median
🐭 $TINY｜Tiny Humans AI 最近 TINY 的关注度明显升温。这个项目最有意思的地方，不只是 Meme 本身，而是它背后结合了 AI × OpenHuman × Solana 社区文化 的叙事，让一个“小小的 Tiny”拥有了更大的想象空间。公开资料显示，TINY 是 Tiny Humans AI / OpenHuman 生态中的社区 Meme，并围绕 AI 助手与开源技术建立品牌。 从市场表现来看，近期交易活跃度明显提升，持币人数和成交量也出现增长，说明市场注意力正在重新聚集。 更重要的是，项目官方近期持续强调产品建设、社区扩张以及 buyback & burn 机制，这让 TINY 不只是一个单纯依靠 Meme 热度的代币。 我比较看好 TINY 的一点，是它拥有非常容易传播的品牌形象，同时又能够借助 AI 这一长期热门叙事不断扩展故事空间。Meme 负责吸引注意力，AI 叙事负责扩大想象力，社区则负责把热度延续下去。 如果后续产品进展、社区活跃度和市场交易热度能够继续保持，TINY 或许还有机会成为 Solana AI Meme 赛道中一个更具辨识度的项目。 小小的 Tiny，可能正在酝酿一个不小的故事。🐭🚀 CA：2AF7CqwieUjUPALL7icuZtL3X7wENdjUjGBMmfV2pump
- Sep 6, 20262.4x their median
$OTC 最近的走势再次展现出非常强的市场吸引力。@OTCDesks https://t.co/X3bgnREpEf 经过前期长时间的低位沉淀与充分换手后，OTC 终于迎来明显的资金回流。价格快速突破原有整理区间，伴随交易活跃度提升，市场关注度也随之迅速升温。 更值得关注的是，这一轮上涨并不是简单的短线拉升。经历此前的调整后，OTC 重新建立起更强的上行结构，并再次向重要高位区域发起挑战。即使上涨过程中出现回调，买盘依然能够快速承接，展现出相当不错的市场韧性。 MukLDtJ8Cx9DxLbeyLRSWPSposTMWuwHANbuaudpump 对于 Meme 而言，能够从长期沉寂中重新吸引资金，并在上涨后保持较高活跃度，本身就是非常值得关注的信号。 如果后续买盘持续回归，并成功突破前方关键压力，OTC 的市场热度或许还会进一步提升。沉淀已久，资金回归，结构转强。OTC 的下一阶段，值得重点关注。
- Aug 23, 20262.4x their median
最近 $BULLSHIT 的走势进入了一个非常值得关注的阶段。经历前期强势上涨后，价格并没有出现明显失控式回落，而是在相对稳定的区间内持续整理，这种表现反而让它的后续潜力更加值得期待。 目前的盘面更像是在进行一次充分的筹码交换。短期波动虽然存在，但如果卖压逐渐减弱，同时交易活跃度重新回升，那么当前整理区域很可能成为下一轮行情的重要蓄力阶段。 我尤其关注 BULLSHIT 的一点，就是它在经历快速上涨之后依然能够保持市场热度。对于 Meme 项目来说，能够从短期爆发逐渐过渡到稳定整理，本身就是市场关注度和承接能力的一种体现。 如果后续买盘重新占据主动，交易量持续放大，并成功突破当前整理区间，BULLSHIT 或许有机会再次释放更强的上涨动能。 真正值得关注的往往不是一根 K 线，而是项目能否在震荡中积累新的共识。BULLSHIT 目前的结构正在变得越来越有意思，下一步表现值得持续关注。@BULLSHIT_ANSEM zj1jpp7QMveWHLs61vL9KMZf254KvW7j4AAmBF8ry2k
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.395% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 109 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.
- What is 金土哥Degen🧲💹's engagement rate on X?
- 金土哥Degen🧲💹 (@DGHUBCrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 193,262 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, 金土哥Degen🧲💹 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DGHUBCrypto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DGHUBCrypto post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.