Back to @DESOJI_YL's profile

ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅 engagement report

@DESOJI_YL - 298K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 298K followers
Per impression
0.273%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
4.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.273% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 519x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tag: #bet9jacode.

Compared with accounts its own size

ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026519x their median

    Mayorkun had to pause his music video sh00t to give the crowd a concert performing Davido B4 B4, Everyone was singing word for word 😂🔥 https://t.co/90sfXfKXuW

    18K1.0K7440371K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026162x their median

    🚨| Moment José Mourinho was furious with Vinícius Jr after his failed skill move led to Roma scoring their second goal. 👀🤬⚽ https://t.co/TNXVvAsAkk

    5.3K4286971534K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202636x their median

    This one still think we are 2015 😂 https://t.co/n7PLTBHV9q

    97313411565113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202611x their median

    Pray for Brentford cos they don’t know what’s about to hit them.

    713615115146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20269.1x their median

    My whole issue with this Cunha and LW discourse is you guys always make him seem like one sort of elite world class forward just to justify the resentment you have for Rashford, our legend and top 13 goalscorer of all time. They’d always overrate his performances or game actions when he does the bare minimum. The club wouldn’t have Raphinha, Vini or Kvara and you’d see me still saying Rashford should start LW. But you see this Cunha gan gan, Rashford offers more, stop making hate cloud your judgement

    2053274179.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.6x their median

    DRAW ACCA 90K ODDS - SD2Y8N MB5 - B82MZH https://t.co/mmkyfWqTak

    833312024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.5x their median

    DRAW ACCA 10 FTX - HY12WQ 5 FT X - ED2VR9 https://t.co/kZfBp1BKZD

    78389122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.2x their median

    I can’t even remember the last time I shared money here! Omo 🤕😂 e don tay reach! My active followers, I SEE YOU O! 👀❤️ All those likes, Retweets, comments… I dey take attendance quietly. 😂 And yes, I owe you people. No be today I know am. 😭 But something is cooking… 👨🏾‍🍳💰 I won’t say when. I won’t say how much. I won’t even say how many people… Before una start calculating my account balance, abeg relax. 😂😭 Just know say somebody will soon scream “AHHH! Na me?!” 👀💸 Stay active. You never know. 😌🔥

    632923013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.1x their median

    DRAW ACCA 92K ODDS - V72C83 MB5 - CW1ED7 https://t.co/ZWNW1Nswqs

    702913020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    DRAW ACCA 91K ODDS - 761C19 MB5 - HP22MW https://t.co/U3RbDjJHtd

    73288023K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bet9jacode

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.273% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 519x its own typical post.

What is ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅's engagement rate on X?
ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅 (@DESOJI_YL) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,049 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, ÙÑČŁË BŁVČK ČÒFFÊË ♟️🦅 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DESOJI_YL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DESOJI_YL post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going