DC_Draino engagement report
@DC_Draino - 2.3M followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7.0K interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.3%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 203K times each, and 3.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 155K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
DC_Draino's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.3%, DC_Draino sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 58% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 319 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 20, 202622x their median
I just want to point out… the amount of money the U.S. has spent on war in the last 2.5 months is roughly the same cost that Bernie Sanders proposed for universal college. So the real question is never ‘can we afford it’… it’s what we choose to prioritize.
- Oct 9, 202619x their median
Charlie Kirk is publicly executed over his views Leftists: 👏😂🥳👏 Trump orders the public execution of a literal Jihadi terrorist that killed 12 US soldiers, one civilian, and injured 32 Leftists: 😡🥺😭😡
- Aug 10, 202617x their median
I just found this clip of Zohran Mamdani on an Arab podcast, admitting that he fooled white liberals Progressive ideology is just a tool His real priority? "Identity" https://t.co/cj9TrN3ryu
- Oct 1, 202615x their median
Los inmigrantes africanos y musulmanes queman todas las escuelas de Burdeos, Francia. A Putin no le hace falta bombardear Europa. El enemigo ya está dentro. https://t.co/qTiSR6BPVQ
- Aug 3, 202614x their median
July 2020. Steps of the Supreme Court. America’s Frontline Doctors stood in white coats and told the American people the truth the regime did not want spoken: COVID was treatable. Early treatment worked. Nobody needed to die. Lockdowns were never necessary. We were censored within hours. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube erased the video. Careers were destroyed. Doctors were threatened. Patients were denied the medicine that could have saved them. They called us dangerous. They were the danger. History has already rendered its verdict. We were right. They lied. And the people paid the price in lives, liberty, and lost years. Watch it. Share it. Bookmark it. Never let them memory-hole what they did. The truth was never the threat. Their power was.
- Sep 12, 202614x their median
How did the Black guy become the center of a trial where he didn't strangled 3 kids?
- Sep 12, 202613x their median
Lindsay Clancy actually killed her 3 kids A Black juror didn't kill anyone Guess which one White Liberals have demonized more? This is what blatant racism looks like when it wears a liberal mask
- Sep 10, 202613x their median
They killed the "debate me" guy, then cheered his death. They don't want debate.
- Aug 7, 202612x their median
The mass removal of flock cameras is the closest Americans have gotten to the Boston Tea Party since 1773.
- Sep 2, 202612x their median
The reason people hate flock cameras is that they know the government will not use them to lock up the insane depraved criminals who will stab you while you walk through Times Square but will instead mail you a ticket for speeding on an empty highway at 2AM.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7.0K interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.3%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 203K times each, and 3.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 155K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is DC_Draino's engagement rate on X?
- DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) has an engagement rate of 0.3%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,344,374 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.3%, DC_Draino sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DC_Draino have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DC_Draino post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.