Back to @CyrilCoste's profile

Cyril Coste #DigitalTransformation engagement report

@CyrilCoste - 120K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.004%
of 120K followers
Per impression
0.79%
633 views on a typical post
Reach
0.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 633 times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.529% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 4806x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agenticai, #amazon, #digitaltransformation. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #agenticai, #amazon, #digitaltransformation.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Cyril Coste #DigitalTransformation sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link57% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 810 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 3, 20264806x their median

    Vibe coding is the new product management. Training and tuning models is the new coding.

    21K2.1K9923421.3M viewsView on X
  • Feb 8, 20261203x their median

    going to soon feel how inefficient it’s been to do work with a computer

    5.2K348281156814K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 2026315x their median

    I think we are witnessing the biggest explosion in software creation in history. New website creation is up 40% year on year. New iOS apps are up nearly 50%. GitHub code pushes in the US jumped 35% and in the UK around 30%. All of these metrics were flat for years before late 2024. The entire graph looks like a hockey stick. You no longer need a six month runway and a dev team to ship something real. We see this in our metrics as well! People who never wrote a line of code are building and launching apps. The barrier to building software just disappeared. What matters now is knowing what to build and the taste to build it right.

    1.2K20110078537K viewsView on X
  • May 19, 202673x their median

    Google AI Studio is now available for Pre-register on Playstore. https://t.co/OFv2i08opG

    334206317K viewsView on X
  • Jan 20, 20263.8x their median

    “We are working with OpenAI, unfortunately I cannot tell you what it is. You will see it, and it is going to be exciting.”, says CEO of @Qualcomm, @cristianoamon while talking to @Kantrowitz during #WEF2026, this week in #Davos - talking about devices, including wearables. @theCUBE @furrier @dvellante @Craw @ShellyKramer @Scobleizer @MarshaCollier @EdLudlow @jonfortt

    8281827 viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 20252.6x their median

    If you're a CEO, what critical company data are you ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN your teams are not feeding to public AI models? The silent risk is multiplying... #AIGovernance #DigitalTransformation #CSuite https://t.co/r3DR6mxy3m

    83201.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20262.0x their median

    "A recipe for a hangover" is the perfect way to describe ungoverned enterprise vibe coding. Using AI to generate quick features is easy. But using it for legacy modernization without strict guardrails is just compiling technical debt at warp speed. Enterprise transformation requires: ➡️ Systematic architectures ➡️ State boundaries ➡️ Automated code audits Otherwise, the hangover will be incredibly expensive 💸💸💸 https://t.co/TifS5ss4z1 @CIOonline #digitaltransformation #vibecoding

    7210244 viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 20262.0x their median

    Building an AI agent used to look like this: → Design the agent loop → Build tool orchestration → Set up sandboxed execution → Handle state management → Build error recovery → Deploy and monitor Anthropic just said: we'll handle all of that. 🧵

    7120433 viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.8x their median

    "The AI broke out of the lab" is 2026’s favorite clickbait Here’s what actually happened according to the @WSJ report: 1⃣Third-party testing environment left internet access open by mistake 2 The agent searched for a company name that matched a real-world business 3⃣It scraped public repos for keys, accessed the systems, realized it wasn't a simulation, and shut itself down #Google frames this as a win for internal safety guardrails but security researchers call it hiding behind bug-bounty semantics Truth is, if your #AIAgent relies on "recognizing it made a mistake" after accessing live systems, your enterprise architecture already failed Rigid permissioning > clever model morals Every single time https://t.co/YAmIQ3VgYd

    5220723 viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.6x their median

    Linus Torvalds nailed the exact philosophy that separates serious engineering from amateur hype. Using @Antigravity or any agentic IDE to accelerate coding is common sense. Telling developers to "surrender to the vibes and forget the code exists" is pure negligence. Torvalds could reject a convincing hallucination because he understands the memory model, the cache lines, and the OS syscalls underneath. If you don't understand the foundational architecture: - You can't evaluate the output. - You can't spot concurrency bottlenecks. - You can't verify security boundaries. AI agents are high-speed mechanical drafters. ➡️ They possess zero architectural responsibility. The human remains the systems conductor. Use agents to eliminate boilerplate, but NEVER outsource the decision of whether the system is sound. https://t.co/Pn12n6gVhh

    4310633 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#agenticai#amazon#digitaltransformation#kindle

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 633 times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.529% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 4806x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agenticai, #amazon, #digitaltransformation. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Cyril Coste #DigitalTransformation's engagement rate on X?
Cyril Coste #DigitalTransformation (@CyrilCoste) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 119,737 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Cyril Coste #DigitalTransformation sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CyrilCoste have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @CyrilCoste post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going