PlayerSells
Back to @CynthiaLIVE's profile

Cynthia Johnson engagement report

@CynthiaLIVE - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.004%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.148%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
2.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
54
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.148% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #build, #numbers.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #build, #numbers.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cynthia Johnson's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Cynthia Johnson sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.319%
p902.64%
p99357.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,789 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 446,562 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.319%
90th percentile2.64%
99th percentile357.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video16% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link11% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%7.9K
  • 16% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 242 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 10, 202622x their median

    I love books because there aren’t any ads in them

    976150541542K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20267.1x their median

    We're celebrating Nature's covers, and the human art of scientific illustration in the age of artificial intelligence. Read more: https://t.co/lalgjfcMng https://t.co/SiQu5XHWhj

    3016810589K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20256.1x their median

    Think for yourself, act for others. The first step makes you real and the second makes you relevant. Dr. Eric Wood of @TCU - interviewed me in @Forbes about personal branding for emerging adults, a topic I care deeply about. @Bellivyinc https://t.co/dk7YbIbFDW

    128191101117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20265.7x their median

    Why do some influencers fail to influence? A new Yale study found that an influencer's success depends not only on who they are, but also on the social network around them. The findings could help shape everything from marketing campaigns to public health messaging. Learn more about what drives the spread of ideas: https://t.co/57M0o5s13L

    231636949K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20264.6x their median

    The human brain is not a machine https://t.co/24o4BMyw9b

    17352141038K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20264.1x their median

    You can now preorder the paperback of Make Your Own Job, with this gorgeous new cover!! https://t.co/6KapbQKj16 https://t.co/0yMetEAZzC

    185295135K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20263.9x their median

    What if the rarest form of intelligence isn't a high IQ at all? Some of the most creative minds excel at connecting ideas from completely different fields—a trait psychologists call integrative intelligence. Here's how it works. https://t.co/Ia8wis2JmS

    1454771227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20163.5x their median

    What Happened When A 'Proud Quitter' Asked For Time Off To Backpack The World via @forbes https://t.co/f4IzELdA1z

    1463635View on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.7x their median

    What does it mean to be bored?

    693621343K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.6x their median

    Meta is testing an AI bedtime story app for people with no imagination https://t.co/SrU5PtIwFI

    85152716126K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#build#numbers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.148% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #build, #numbers.

What is Cynthia Johnson's engagement rate on X?
Cynthia Johnson (@CynthiaLIVE) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,298,168 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Cynthia Johnson sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CynthiaLIVE have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CynthiaLIVE post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going