Back to @CultureStacked's profile

Culture Stacked engagement report

@CultureStacked - 484K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 484K followers
Per impression
0.724%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
82
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 484K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Culture Stacked's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Culture Stacked sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202619x their median

    If you know what this is, your childhood was elite. https://t.co/J7rYcSfell

    1.1K2538496192K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202615x their median

    https://t.co/j8esuZlBJJ

    1.2K272420K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.2x their median

    2026 might go down as one of the greatest years in cinema history. https://t.co/ANRRJghE5s

    617473213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.4x their median

    Cristiano Ronaldo just announced this is probably his last year in football, 24 years after he first walked out at Old Trafford. In 2003, when an 18-year-old from Madeira put on the number 7 shirt and did seven stepovers in a row: Facebook did not exist, Zuckerberg was a 19-year-old with a half-built idea there was no YouTube, no Twitter, no Instagram, no TikTok and smartphones did not exist. People had Nokias with Snake on them Messi was a 16-year-old nobody outside Spain had heard of. Since then: the iPhone was invented, the global economy nearly collapsed, Bitcoin went from a whitepaper to a trillion dollars, a pandemic shut down the planet. artificial intelligence learned to write, code and think, an entire internet was built, sold and replaced twice over and through every single one of those years, Ronaldo was still playing. There are grown adults with children who have never once opened a football season without him in it, the world changed completely. he did not. Thank you, Cristiano.

    20056111139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.4x their median

    19 years of friendship later πŸŽ“πŸ‘¨β€πŸŽ“ https://t.co/Eh3Y30g6My

    27601017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.1x their median

    First look at a car chase in GTA 6. https://t.co/N8zb5gLeQM

    213391012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.9x their median

    Total solar eclipse. https://t.co/EBI9MWIDNU

    22373215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.8x their median

    Cristiano Ronaldo in newly shared pictures. https://t.co/6BJh77mMJO

    22510218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.5x their median

    Spanish Olympic skateboarder Danny Leon timed a jump perfectly with a solar eclipse and called it The Move of his Life. https://t.co/KwiEp6wHLu

    134563819K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.3x their median

    Cristiano Ronaldo commented on Messi’s post about his dad. https://t.co/ZOXxRwuzOT

    18510016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 484K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Culture Stacked's engagement rate on X?
Culture Stacked (@CultureStacked) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 483,748 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Culture Stacked sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CultureStacked have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CultureStacked post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Culture Stacked (@CultureStacked) Engagement Rate - 0.017% | PlayerSells