Culture Stacked engagement report
@CultureStacked - 484K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 484K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Culture Stacked's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.017%, Culture Stacked sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 202619x their median
If you know what this is, your childhood was elite. https://t.co/J7rYcSfell
- Aug 10, 202615x their median
https://t.co/j8esuZlBJJ
- Aug 20, 20268.2x their median
2026 might go down as one of the greatest years in cinema history. https://t.co/ANRRJghE5s
- Aug 17, 20263.4x their median
Cristiano Ronaldo just announced this is probably his last year in football, 24 years after he first walked out at Old Trafford. In 2003, when an 18-year-old from Madeira put on the number 7 shirt and did seven stepovers in a row: Facebook did not exist, Zuckerberg was a 19-year-old with a half-built idea there was no YouTube, no Twitter, no Instagram, no TikTok and smartphones did not exist. People had Nokias with Snake on them Messi was a 16-year-old nobody outside Spain had heard of. Since then: the iPhone was invented, the global economy nearly collapsed, Bitcoin went from a whitepaper to a trillion dollars, a pandemic shut down the planet. artificial intelligence learned to write, code and think, an entire internet was built, sold and replaced twice over and through every single one of those years, Ronaldo was still playing. There are grown adults with children who have never once opened a football season without him in it, the world changed completely. he did not. Thank you, Cristiano.
- Aug 8, 20263.4x their median
19 years of friendship later ππ¨βπ https://t.co/Eh3Y30g6My
- Aug 27, 20263.1x their median
First look at a car chase in GTA 6. https://t.co/N8zb5gLeQM
- Aug 16, 20262.9x their median
Total solar eclipse. https://t.co/EBI9MWIDNU
- Aug 20, 20262.8x their median
Cristiano Ronaldo in newly shared pictures. https://t.co/6BJh77mMJO
- Aug 13, 20262.5x their median
Spanish Olympic skateboarder Danny Leon timed a jump perfectly with a solar eclipse and called it The Move of his Life. https://t.co/KwiEp6wHLu
- Aug 12, 20262.3x their median
Cristiano Ronaldo commented on Messiβs post about his dad. https://t.co/ZOXxRwuzOT
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 484K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.724% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
- What is Culture Stacked's engagement rate on X?
- Culture Stacked (@CultureStacked) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 483,748 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.017%, Culture Stacked sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CultureStacked have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CultureStacked post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.