Culture Stacked engagement report
@CultureStacked - 477K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #streetfighter.
Compared with accounts its own size
Culture Stacked's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Culture Stacked sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 108 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 16, 2026115x their median
More evidence. Civilization is in decline. https://t.co/j2PHgMKUT4
- Oct 14, 202696x their median
The decline of a civilization https://t.co/W24gLiGoID
- Aug 17, 202680x their median
If you know what this is, your childhood was elite. https://t.co/J7rYcSfell
- Aug 10, 202665x their median
https://t.co/j8esuZlBJJ
- Aug 20, 202635x their median
2026 might go down as one of the greatest years in cinema history. https://t.co/ANRRJghE5s
- Sep 15, 202629x their median
An oasis in the middle of the Libyan desert. 🤍 https://t.co/MXEVYyBcKi
- Sep 13, 202623x their median
Henry Cavill has been officially announced as the next James Bond. https://t.co/uM2toSu4kD
- Oct 14, 202618x their median
QRC📸 https://t.co/46zgwZnQc6
- Aug 17, 202615x their median
Cristiano Ronaldo just announced this is probably his last year in football, 24 years after he first walked out at Old Trafford. In 2003, when an 18-year-old from Madeira put on the number 7 shirt and did seven stepovers in a row: Facebook did not exist, Zuckerberg was a 19-year-old with a half-built idea there was no YouTube, no Twitter, no Instagram, no TikTok and smartphones did not exist. People had Nokias with Snake on them Messi was a 16-year-old nobody outside Spain had heard of. Since then: the iPhone was invented, the global economy nearly collapsed, Bitcoin went from a whitepaper to a trillion dollars, a pandemic shut down the planet. artificial intelligence learned to write, code and think, an entire internet was built, sold and replaced twice over and through every single one of those years, Ronaldo was still playing. There are grown adults with children who have never once opened a football season without him in it, the world changed completely. he did not. Thank you, Cristiano.
- Aug 8, 202615x their median
19 years of friendship later 🎓👨🎓 https://t.co/Eh3Y30g6My
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.
- What is Culture Stacked's engagement rate on X?
- Culture Stacked (@CultureStacked) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 476,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Culture Stacked sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CultureStacked have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CultureStacked post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.