Back to @Cule_barca1's profile

𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™ engagement report

@Cule_barca1 - 155K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.228%
of 155K followers
Per impression
4.53%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
5.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
352
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 352 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.228%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 4.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™'s engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.228%, 𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 207 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 202338x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - جرب شكل اللايك الجديد على النادي الأفضل تاريخياً [ برشلونة ] . 🔵🔴 #Genshin https://t.co/bgWeuKSTGN

    13K6813152.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.6x their median

    ياهو خارق ابيه في ميلان كيف الطريقة ؟ https://t.co/RWYVpMZw8P

    1.8K2145338198K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.8x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - السوبر فيرمين ' جعل الرقم [ 7 ] نظيف و جميل ومُمتع و رائع . 🔵🔴 https://t.co/073YpQUzyV

    1.6K521213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.7x their median

    🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 | - رسميـــــــاً : إيرادات برشلونة لعالم 2025-2026 تتجاوز ( الـمليار يورو 💶 ] ، 🔥✅ - وكُل هذا وملعب الكامب نو لم يكتمل كُلياً بعد ،🥶 - برشلونة قادم و بقوة إقتصادياً و رياضياً ليعود كما كان و أقوي ليحتل عرش كُرة القدم . 🔵🔴 https://t.co/hbndZXJJKA

    1.6K703045K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.9x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - في أخر ثلاث تدريبات كان هناك مباريات مصغرة ، جميع المباريات كان كانسيلو يلعب في الظهير الأيمن مع تغيير في تمركزه ليدخل في العمق أكثر كلاعب وسط مع تحركات هجومية أكثر ، فليك يبدو بأنه يُجهز في ( كانسيلو ) للظهير مع دور جديد، يُريدة فقط ان يستعيد لياقته 100% ليبدء به. 🔵🔴 https://t.co/bsuLq0HCoE

    1.3K267129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.4x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - أنا سعيد الآن لعدم قدوم ( الفاريز )،✅ - قدوم الفاريز كان عدم ظهور رافينها المهاجم الذي الآن مبدع في هذا المركز، - قدوم الفاريز كان لن يجعل غوردون اساسياً بأستمرار لأنه مركز رافينها وفليك لن يستغني عنه ولن نشاهد ابداعه كما الآن، - برشلونة هوا الفائز لكل ما حصل .✅ https://t.co/BXvr1a23ps

    1.1K2932155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.3x their median

    🚨🚨🚨| - 🎙️ جماهير ريال بيتيس ' 🔥 - نعم نعم ' انتصرنا على ريال مدريد و التحكيم.🥶

    1.1K571014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - قناة ريال مدريد لماذا تنبح ؟؟ - هدف بيتيس صحيح،✅ - هدف الريال غير صحيح،✅ - عدم إعادة ركلة الجزاء قرارها صحيح،✅ - طرد غولير صحيح لكنه لم يطرده،❌ - اخطاء ليست اخطاء احتسها لكم،❌ - تساهل كبير للحكم معكم،❌ - ماذا تُريدون أكثر يسجل لكم الحكم نفسه ، نادً مضحك جداً.😂

    8807821033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.2x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - شعور جميل أن تكون لك دكة بدلاء قوية ، واخيراً عشنا هذه الرفاهية بعد سنوات طويلة ، - شُكراً سيادة الرئيس لابورتا ، شُكرًا ديكو ، شُكراً فليك ، ❤️ https://t.co/SqiDJthldd

    73520307.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.0x their median

    🛑⚠️ | - ريال بيتيس ينتصر علي ريال مدريد ' ✅ - كُرة القدم أنتصرت ، العدالة أنتصرت . ✅

    66716507.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 352 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.228%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 4.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

What is 𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™'s engagement rate on X?
𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™ (@Cule_barca1) has an engagement rate of 0.228%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 154,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.228%, 𝐀𝐋𝐈 - 𝑭𝑪𝑩™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cule_barca1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cule_barca1 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going