Back to @Crypto_Pranjal's profile

Pranjal Bora 🧭 engagement report

@Crypto_Pranjal - 186K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.091%
of 186K followers
Per impression
0.921%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
9.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
169
interactions (median)
Saved
0.104%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.921% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 616 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pranjal Bora 🧭's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.091%, Pranjal Bora 🧭 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link71% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 517 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 20263.6x their median

    More SOL Just Became Available to Claim! Solana’s rent reduction Step 2 just went live on mainnet, unlocking another 612,000 SOL, worth around $62.5M. So even if you claimed after my last post, you may have more available again. ✅ Claim yours: https://t.co/1RNtxaVgQS And yes, more claims are coming. This is only Step 2 of 5. As the next three steps go live, eligible accounts can unlock more SOL again. Across all five steps, up to 3M+ SOL could eventually become claimable. Again, this isn’t an airdrop. It’s SOL that already belonged to users but was sitting locked as extra account rent.

    49269478112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.1x their median

    Free BTC rewards are back on Starknet. @Starknet is bringing back its strkBTC giveaway after the last campaign ended a few months ago. ✅ Register here: https://t.co/u5cbipKj3H Registration closes in 21 hours. It’s luck-based, but registration costs nothing and takes only a few seconds. If you get lucky, you could receive some free money. Nothing to lose.

    4276429244K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.6x their median

    Claim RevokeCash x Pudgy Penguins Free SBT. Last year, @RevokeCash and @pudgypenguins made a Cold Storage SBT for Pudgy holders who kept their wallets free of token approvals. Now anyone can claim it. You just need a wallet with zero open approvals on Ethereum mainnet and to pass a short security quiz. ✅ Here’s how to claim: 1. Go to https://t.co/TMk8VYuKF7 2. Search your wallet address. 3. If you have open approvals on Ethereum mainnet, revoke them. To select them all, tick the checkbox beside "Revoke Selected" in the results. You’ll need to confirm each revoke transaction one by one. Once you’ve cleared them, pass a few simple quiz questions and claim your SBT. No wallet connection or tx is needed to claim the SBT. -------------- I just revoked around 140 old approvals while doing this. Some were from projects that are pretty much dead now. The recent Magic Eden / Limit Break exploit shows why this matters. People had approved a contract back in 2024, and those approvals were still active when attackers found a way to use them to drain NFTs and tokens. Nice move by @RevokeCash. You get the SBT, and a reason to clean up your wallet at the same time.

    3475439250K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.6x their median

    Pheasant Network airdrop claim is live. ✅ Claim here: https://t.co/IOzSptw2bC You have 21 days to claim. It’s a bridge, so you might’ve used it without even remembering. Worth checking your wallets. I only used it a few times and still got around $100.

    3326144069K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.4x their median

    Oh, I’m currently #2 on the @jumperapp waitlist 👀 Check your rank: https://t.co/g2spgE9k78 https://t.co/kTG2y64div

    321681238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.4x their median

    Jumper $JUMP Hopium Checker! 👀 Built a little unofficial Jumper XP valuation checker based on your current XP and Pass level, with airdrop estimates. Simply paste your EVM or Solana wallet and it shows your XP, rank, tier and what your slice could be worth at whatever FDV and airdrop % you pick. ✅ Check yours here: https://t.co/PeMIMVjdur The math is simple: your share of all the XP Jumper has handed out so far, times the airdrop, times the FDV. You can play with the assumptions too, like only counting top wallets or a minimum Pass level. Check your score, flex your card, tag your Jumper buddy and see who's the bigger whale 🐳 ▶️ Obviously unofficial. No token has been announced and this guarantees nothing. Everyone on CT is speculating about XP right now so I made this for fun. Enjoy.

    3203646852K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.3x their median

    Something new! 😎 https://t.co/9esXww3ruA

    284799019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.3x their median

    Finally got my Tier 1 Architect badge on Arc. Tbh, I applied almost 3-4 months ago, but nothing happened, so I never bothered applying again. Checked today and turns out I’ve finally been granted it. Looks like many users got the badge today. Go check your Arc House profile too, maybe you got it as well.

    3031665022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.1x their median

    Wow, Backpack’s $BP has pumped a lot. My airdrop was worth around $300 when I claimed it. Just checked again, and it’s now worth $1,600+ If you claimed the airdrop and never sold, your tokens are most likely staked. Go check your portfolio once. ✅ Check here: https://t.co/jv2QafAXSO If you want to sell, open the "B"P page from the left menu and click Unstake. Unstaking takes 7 days. Another benefit of never selling these peanut airdrops 😂

    3101233387K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.1x their median

    " $JUMP sale at $75M… could it really list at $400M? " I’m joining this one. I’ve used @jumperapp for a while, and the sale price looks interesting when you look at its users and what’s coming next. Here’s why I’m bullish, and what I actually expect at listing 🧵 https://t.co/YaLc2dUeel

    2951737136K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.921% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 616 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

What is Pranjal Bora 🧭's engagement rate on X?
Pranjal Bora 🧭 (@Crypto_Pranjal) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,929 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.091%, Pranjal Bora 🧭 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Crypto_Pranjal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Crypto_Pranjal post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going