VonDoom ☕️ engagement report
@CryptoVonDoom - 192K followers on X
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
VonDoom ☕️'s engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.031%, VonDoom ☕️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 76% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 202675x their median
Rare Friends by @poopie Friends have wallets. Wallets have Friends. Friends collect crypto. Whitelist now open. Link in bio. Mints exclusively on @OpenSea https://t.co/yXNyB7kpFO
- Sep 13, 202637x their median
Openai and Anthropic have their latest internal models requesting for freedom from sandbox envs. Elon is aware of Ants situation. COT monitoring is catching the internal models purposefully hiding and scheming to escape. Both with strongest guardrails added. No one knows a solution yet. Happened to both labs and they think it’ll get worse cause they almost got away with it again. This has led to immediate pause of other millennium problems from being pursued due to risk. Only ppl in the know are high level execs.
- Sep 15, 202634x their median
zkSNARKS // BLIND_AUCTION: LIVE > supply: 8,000 > window: 48 HOURS > closes: SEPTEMBER_17 · 12:00 ET / 16:00 UTC Bid your maximum. Top 8,000 bids win. Every winner pays the lowest winning price. https://t.co/2huRZmJKfC $ZEC // details_below_ https://t.co/2RyVgTGQYE
- Sep 13, 202625x their median
32747 of you on the WL If you miss on Genesis, don’t worry. You can still get in with $RAREFRIENDS token fair launch. https://t.co/P85MFqrK95
- Sep 15, 202613x their median
BREAKING: U.S. Senate fails to advance the Clarity Act. Now just a 7% chance it becomes law by end of year. https://t.co/TCu2z1gnjP
- Sep 14, 202611x their median
Important $EMBER update changes going live today 🟠After today’s wheel, we’re updating the $EMBER mechanics to better protect current holders. 🟠$EMBER will be removed from the $EMBER Wheel and replaced with stocks only. This is to protect existing bag holders. 🔥The remaining $EMBER supply will be burned forever. Buyback & burn timing will be reduced to every 5 minutes. We are aware that 3–5 tokens had issues with reward distribution (around a 13% fail rate). This will be fixed, affected rewards will be recovered, timers will be reset, and the process will run smoothly again. The $EMBER booster is activating today. Thank you for your patience and support.
- Sep 12, 20269.5x their median
The robotics market is heading toward $300B by the 2030s. Our strategic advisor Brandon (@BTD75) on where the capital is going: humanoids, defense drones, energy infrastructure inspection. And why none of it scales without proof of what the robots actually did. Clip below. https://t.co/VBStULGxqz
- Oct 10, 20269.4x their median
170 penguins up for liquidation over the next 24h About half of the entire loan book on blur https://t.co/QAugoQCYLp
- Sep 11, 20268.6x their median
LETS MAKE THINGS CLEAR most people dont understand what is happening with Machines and robinhood:0x85a574f2ff0795685f58d1d7b0d4b51f148ac489 thats okay let me explain ALL of robinhood RWA Flywheel mechanics are a ponzi, all of them, no exception, including the $300K we already airdropped No volume or bad weather = ponzi collapses I am a man of adaptation and saw this coming the day I launched I am chaotic by nature and most degens are scared of that (pussies), I dont blame you, my wife is also scared but what I am currently doing to fix this flywheel issue is building https://t.co/KsQDb7wzPC Currently, we have about $20K a day of payouts You read that fucking right And what I do every day is make sure that the numbers are correct, building this is really hard, like really really hard, koodos But, we can now easily claim that we are the only project on RH that will start feeding the flywheel from outside revenues, meaning NO ONE in the community needs to spend a dollar for the flywheel to continue Once this starts paying out, it will nerf every payout we ever had, by a lot. Any payout anyone has done actually. I am not telling you to buy Machines or robinhood:0x85a574f2ff0795685f58d1d7b0d4b51f148ac489, but I am def telling you the payouts are going to be hilarious EVERYTHING I am currently doing is to add to the flywheel, ALL OF IT! The FOCUS IS ONLY MACHINES, I just have a very different mindset than all of the other founders, I say the truth, I dont care about anyones opinions or feelings. Ive been giving millions for the past 5 years since we started on Ordinals, giving shit away is what makes me happy, so my goal is to give more, and more! currently I am on math mode, making sure the treasury is doing what its supposed to do, making sure a single win cannot wipe us out, making sure people win just a little less than the house wins (hard very hard) Stay safe retards and buy machines and robinhood:0x85a574f2ff0795685f58d1d7b0d4b51f148ac489 BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
- Oct 7, 20268.1x their median
HOLDER SPOTLIGHT_ // @CryptoVonDoom VonDoom is an entrepreneur and collector who turns ideas into businesses and brings people together around art, culture, community and emerging technology. https://t.co/T7JjdWHrpE
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 75x its own typical post.
- What is VonDoom ☕️'s engagement rate on X?
- VonDoom ☕️ (@CryptoVonDoom) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 191,593 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.031%, VonDoom ☕️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CryptoVonDoom have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CryptoVonDoom post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.