Back to @CryptoNewton's profile

Shelby engagement report

@CryptoNewton - 268K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 268K followers
Per impression
0.533%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
5.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
76
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.57/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 440 interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #algorand.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shelby's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Shelby sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20265.8x their median

    Missed our latest AMA with Floki core advisor @100bviking? We've got you covered. B talked about physical Floki debit cards, release date timing, the product that will replace Floki Trading Bot, and more. Read the full AMA here: https://t.co/XVcLgVh6wo https://t.co/dklu5A6xzW

    3616314242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.2x their median

    I keep adding $FLOKI. Not because of one announcement or one green candle, but because I’ve watched this ecosystem keep building while most people only watch the price. The market can stay impatient. I’m happy to keep accumulating. ⚔️ https://t.co/DJlmIBoUyg

    3175327124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.4x their median

    ethereum:0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 lost 90%+ and now nobody wants to touch it. Perfect. 👀 The weekly chart is back at a zone that has historically mattered A LOT. I’m not saying the bottom is guaranteed. I’m saying the risk/reward gets much more interesting down here than it was above $2. $0.90 is the monster reclaim. Get back above there and we could be looking at a completely different ethereum:0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85. LFG! 🚀

    2842816319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.2x their median

    IMO $FLOKI has built one of the strongest foundations in the memecoin sector. It survived the last cycle, reached a new ATH in 2024, expanded into gaming and tokenization, gained regulated European exposure, and now has an exciting new product that's about to launch. A real ecosystem that will thrive... slow, slow, then fast.

    2474824123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.1x their median

    ethereum:0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 https://t.co/iqEG0oeazb

    286263014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.1x their median

    $FET https://t.co/JcAGb39PAJ

    281236024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.5x their median

    ethereum:0xcf0c122c6b73ff809c693db761e7baebe62b6a2e is one of those projects people underestimate when the market gets quiet. It survived an entire cycle, pushed to a new ATH, built a global brand, expanded beyond the meme into real products, gaming and tokenization, and kept one of the strongest communities in the space. Most memecoins disappear when the hype disappears. ethereum:0xcf0c122c6b73ff809c693db761e7baebe62b6a2e kept building. That matters. When serious liquidity rotates back into memes, I don't think the market will waste much time figuring out which names survived. Slow. Slow. Then suddenly FAST. I'm betting ethereum:0xcf0c122c6b73ff809c693db761e7baebe62b6a2e will be one of them. 🐕🔥

    2044117323K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.3x their median

    $FLOKI https://t.co/touhk00hSZ

    2112716016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.2x their median

    $SUI https://t.co/XICx7PeNc0

    217194122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.8x their median

    $FET https://t.co/3yLkQHBSYo

    193185012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#algorand

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 440 interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

What is Shelby's engagement rate on X?
Shelby (@CryptoNewton) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 268,236 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Shelby sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CryptoNewton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CryptoNewton post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going