Cred engagement report
@CryptoCred - 836K followers on X
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 836K followers, an engagement rate of 0.373%. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.373%, Cred sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 25% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 680 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 22, 20269.6x their median
TRUST IN TRUMP 🇺🇸📈 https://t.co/7JN9uwDYse
- Mar 3, 20262.5x their median
"AI agents will replace manual trading." Yeah right I'd love to see an AI agent sell the bottom, lever into a revenge trade, get liquidated, and then reenter the trade with double the size before closing for a catastrophic loss
- Jun 17, 20242.3x their median
[Pinned] I've updated my list of trading resources. It's now organised into different categories with additional content. All free, built over the last 7+ years: https://t.co/KBW57kT5T0
- Mar 1, 2026
$BTC dropped 50% from high to low. Did I sell the top? No. Did I hedge? No. But do I have a tactical pool of capital that’s ready to deploy into cyclical entries? Also no.
- May 28, 2026
https://t.co/fZwuBGoDhZ
- Aug 19, 2026
This was one of the highest volatility days in recent crypto history. Was I long the BTC breakout? No. Did I catch the HYPE news? No. But do I have a tactical pool of capital that’s ready to deploy with a clear plan if a new trend forms? Also no.
- Aug 19, 2026
This is a huge inflection point for BTC after one of the largest short liquidation events in recent history I've spent the last 4 hours studying ETF flows, Microstrategy credit facilities, cross-exchange liquidity and funding rates, as well as prime OTC desk inventory They all point to the same inevitable conclusion: If it keeps going up, then the market is bullish If it stops going up and goes down, then the market is bearish
- Aug 19, 2026
Real talk If you’re on the wrong side during a big move like this, most of your immediate impulses are gonna suck Greatest hits: 1. Revenge short - Can’t believe I missed this piece of shit scam pumping; it’s up so much it HAS to come down 2. Oversized buy - I will use leverage as a time travel machine to make up for being late 3. TA cope - It has to retest the exact level it broke out from immediately because I watched two whole Babypips videos on 1.5x speed 4. All-or-nothing - My only options are 0%. exposure or 100%, nothing in between exists 5. Deer in headlights - oh geez I guess I should wait for a pullback but no what if the consolidation is the pullback hmm maybe I’ll wait for a range to form but what if that range breaks down do I buy the retest of the breakout or the range reclaim oh man fuck shit what’s Ansem saying 6. Overtrader - I will cement my bloodline on the 5 minute chart; if this next candle is the wrong colour I will either be rich or poor Just chill out, delete your levels, pretend you haven’t looked at the chart in weeks - fresh eyes Then it’s the usual list of simple questions: 1. What signals are firing / what do I think is gonna happen 2. What kind of bet am I making (mean reversion/volatility expansion/new trend/momentum/Blackrock scam etc.) and on what time horizon 3. Where am I wrong 4. Does my position size match the current volatility and align with the shape of my trade idea i.e. points 1-3 FWIW I’m washed but gonna try to jam some spot sub 70k. If it gets accepted below 66-67k (retraces the breakout) then I’ll lose money “Wow it’s up so much what you buy the top?” Then I’ll lose money and look silly on social media. That’s the cost of doing business (at least the first one). Just start LARPing like everyone else and instead of saying “I bought the top” say “I aggressively rebalanced when an ensemble of carefully weighed momentum factor signals fired contemporaneously.”
- Jul 20, 2026
If you trade trend, you'll get a bunch of false starts If you trade momentum, you'll often buy the top/sell the bottom If you trade mean reversion, you'll periodically get carried out by an outsized move And so on for basically every trading system This is the cost of doing business that's embedded into every market effect you're monetising Your job is to understand it and manage it If you try to avoid it entirely you simply won't get paid There's no perfect system, it's all about managing trade-offs Go take a look at your setups/playbook or wherever your trading system lives and map its assumptions and failure cases The stuff you wanna avoid: 1. Mutating your system because the risk feels uncomfy so you get the worst of both worlds e.g. not holding for long trends/outsized moves but still eating the false starts when you're wrong (all the downside, no balls for the upside) 2. Not knowing what the trade-offs are and sizing like a dickhead so when you're wrong it wipes out all your gains e.g. penny collecting on mean reversion with increasing size and then getting fully wiped on the outsized move
- Jul 15, 2026
Explaining to my children that they'll never see their friends again because a candlestick closed below a box I made up and we can't afford the fancy school district anymore
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 836K followers, an engagement rate of 0.373%. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Cred's engagement rate on X?
- Cred (@CryptoCred) has an engagement rate of 0.373%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 836,217 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.373%, Cred sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CryptoCred have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @CryptoCred post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.