Back to @CryptoBusy's profile

CryptoBusy engagement report

@CryptoBusy - 187K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 187K followers
Per impression
0.753%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
5.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
76
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.753% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CryptoBusy's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, CryptoBusy sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 351 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202655x their median

    The ARC token has been minted. Circle is the first publicly traded company to mint a network token for a new blockchain. This is a technical milestone in the Arc roadmap as the network explores a future transition from Proof of Authority toward Proof of Stake. The minting of ARC does not represent any commitment to a public launch of the token. ARC is not live, tradeable, available for public use, or active for staking, governance, fees, or utility. The Arc network remains Proof of Authority today. Future ARC functionality and activation remain subject to change. Official ARC contract: https://t.co/NldipcFjQO

    2.9K442545286507K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202614x their median

    The USD.infra Vault is coming. DAWN is bringing the cash flows of digital infrastructure on-chain as yield for institutions and retail. We built the network. Now we’re launching the RWA protocol for AI compute, connectivity, and edge infrastructure. Sept. 22, 2 PM UTC. 🔒 https://t.co/FeiPR2gJPU

    79211113550150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.6x their median

    $SUI is my next major watchlist. Keep an eye on this breakout! This is a Major resistance - so a breakout from here is definitely huge! Also, we’re building a new hub for our community. Free trading signals, market updates, technical analysis and community discussions. (Link in the comments)

    1612613116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    bitcoin:native needs to break and close above $82.5K to activate the bullish market structure. Why this level? $82.5K is the previous swing high and current resistance. A confirmed breakout would create a higher high, showing that buyers have regained control. Until then, BTC remains inside the range. I want to see a daily close above $82.5K and a successful retest before expecting the next leg higher.

    662016112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    . @ethereum is currently up around +60% this quarter, making Q3 2026 its second-best Q3 ever. Historical Q3 returns: • 2017: +97.9% • 2026: +60.6% • 2025: +56.6% And there’s still time left in September. $ETH momentum remains strong. https://t.co/GpUa8r4AqK

    67151909.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    GM! Two of our biggest watchlist last week is massively pumping! ethereum:0xb50721bcf8d664c30412cfbc6cf7a15145234ad1 up 140% $ZEC up 50% Time to spot the next big pump! https://t.co/TRhO3oTqZL

    69815012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    $BTC is basically stuck in a $76K–$80K range as traders wait for the Fed decision. For now, this is consolidation, not a breakout. The next major move likely starts once either side of this range breaks. https://t.co/urdeichINK

    59112009.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Who else here is a trader and a hybrid athlete? One day I’m reading charts and trading crypto. The next, I’m training for @IRONMANtri , HYROX, Spartan and long-distance races. Different arenas, same mindset: discipline, patience and consistency. Drop your sport below. Let’s connect.

    651312011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    What assets or memes are you holding on robinhood chain? Anyone using FOMO or gmgn? bitcoin:native https://t.co/HYoJj0KPJ1

    53121807.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Recent Bitcoin demand has been driven heavily by futures and perpetual markets, while spot demand remains relatively weak. A stronger and more sustainable $BTC rally usually needs real spot buying behind it. Momentum is here. Now we need spot demand to catch up. https://t.co/cx1rLx6eOD

    49141619.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.753% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

What is CryptoBusy's engagement rate on X?
CryptoBusy (@CryptoBusy) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 187,101 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, CryptoBusy sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CryptoBusy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CryptoBusy post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going