Back to @Cryptic_Web3's profile

Cryptic engagement report

@Cryptic_Web3 - 254K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.118%
of 254K followers
Per impression
1.60%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
7.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
298
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #trump.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cryptic's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.118%, Cryptic sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 313 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 16, 20265.4x their median

    2025 was one hell of a ride! 100+ clients served, 2 strategic acquisitions, 140+ Cryptic Talks, 5 Convergence events across the globe. We made it all happen together. Here’s to making 2026 even bigger 🥂 https://t.co/XmiB9AnvMh

    1.2K15826811377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.9x their median

    🔥 LATEST: @HunterBiden, son of former U.S. President Joe Biden, is launching a memecoin named after his infamous laptop. 🔸️ 20% to airdrops, including wallets that lost money on solana:6p6xgHyF7AeE6TZkSmFsko444wqoP15icUSqi2jfGiPN 🔸️ 30% to founders 🔸️ Up to 30% can be burned based on 30 preset events $LAPTOP launches September 9 on Base with a 1B supply. Burn triggers include Bitcoin hitting a new ATH or a Democrat winning the 2028 election. Tokens tied to unmet conditions will be donated to charity.

    5062943129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.8x their median

    GM, CT 🌱 Touch grass. Clear the mind. Get back to work. https://t.co/dmJLiVARuz

    4632853034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    GM! Back to work. Now rate my setup. 👇🏻 https://t.co/VcraftQK2m

    4562653036K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    🚨LATEST: Nike is getting removed from the S&P 100. The sportswear giant has fallen to a 12-year stock-price low after years of weak growth, shrinking margins, and challenges in Greater China. S&P Dow Jones Indices announced the removal on September 4 as part of its quarterly rebalance, replacing Nike with other companies in the index.

    4422735120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    📽 WATCH: Bitwise CIO @Matt_Hougan predicts Bitcoin will hit $1.3 MILLION by 2035. He also says bitcoin:native has a high chance of reclaiming $100K this year. https://t.co/R5K4Xyi8As

    4312943028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.6x their median

    gm ☀️⛰️ https://t.co/MRHMUuy13M

    4043054033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.5x their median

    LATEST: 🌐 The G20 is moving toward clearer rules for crypto and stablecoins. G20 finance ministers and central bank governors agreed to advance regulatory frameworks for digital assets while supporting innovation and financial stability. They also called for clear pathways for digital asset innovation, recognizing its cross-border opportunities and challenges. This doesn’t create a single global crypto rulebook, but the G20 is pushing for clearer digital asset regulations.

    3773048028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    📈 Tokenized equities are seeing rapid growth onchain. The number of onchain tokenized equity holders has reached a record 1.9 million, up 134% month-over-month and 1,360% year-to-date. Just 10 months ago, fewer than 100,000 addresses held tokenized assets. Going from under 100K holders to 1.9M in just 10 months shows how quickly tokenized equities are gaining traction onchain.

    3653248024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Where will BTC be by year-end?

    3832830119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#trump

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

What is Cryptic's engagement rate on X?
Cryptic (@Cryptic_Web3) has an engagement rate of 0.118%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 254,022 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.118%, Cryptic sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cryptic_Web3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cryptic_Web3 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going