Back to @Crowdfire's profile

Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights engagement report

@Crowdfire - 4.6M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 4.6M followers
Per impression
0.11%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 4.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.197% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163 interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #ethereum, #zec.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #ethereum, #zec.

Compared with accounts its own size

Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 461 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 5, 202518x their median

    After 15 incredible years, we’ve made the deeply difficult decision to shut down Crowdfire. ⏳ We’ll go offline on May 15, 2025 Thank you for letting us be part of your journey. You’ve meant the world to us 💛 If you have any questions, write to us at [email protected] https://t.co/KS2pwunrp8

    511094849K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20265.4x their median

    #Web3 may be entering its consolidation era. Simple Technology Holdings plans a $200M acquisition spree focused on profitable infrastructure, payments, gaming, and digital asset companies, not token speculation or NFTs. The interesting signal: ➡️ Less hype. ➡️ More sustainable businesses. ➡️ AI powering integration. That feels a lot closer to how mature tech ecosystems are built.

    6480012K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20255.9x their median

    How would you use locked posts? . . #socialmediamarketing https://t.co/eGYa1tV1TC

    35116130K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20262.9x their median

    An AI startup that automates dental paperwork just hit a $250M valuation. Sounds boring? That's exactly the point. While everyone is building AI for developers, designers, and knowledge workers, Lassie focused on a painfully specific problem: dental administration. The founders spent months inside dental clinics handling insurance claims, billing, payments, and admin work themselves before writing a single line of code. Today, 700+ clinics use the product. "$250M for dental paperwork?" is probably the wrong question. The right question is: What other boring workflows are worth hundreds of millions if solved well? Because that's exactly where the founders of Lassie looked, and it paid off. 👏

    425004.9K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 20253.1x their median

    Do yourself a favor and schedule your content! . . #socialmediamarketing https://t.co/ahdWjQYKyX

    2116019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.6x their median

    Bitcoin miner meets AI infrastructure: Riot just signed a $9.1B, 20-year deal to power a frontier AI lab's compute needs at its Texas facility, and the stock jumped over 20% on the news. This isn't really a crypto story. It's a power story. AI labs need massive, ready-to-go electricity capacity fast, and Bitcoin miners already have exactly that sitting idle between mining cycles. Expect more of these crossover deals as the AI power crunch intensifies. Are you tracking the AI infrastructure race?

    4211012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.4x their median

    Bitcoin has climbed to an 11-week high. 📈 The move comes as the US Treasury announced plans to double the size of certain debt buybacks, putting liquidity conditions back in the spotlight. Lower long-term yields and a weaker dollar helped support risk assets, including Bitcoin. Another reminder that sometimes the biggest crypto stories start outside crypto. #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #Markets #MarketNews

    7170011K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 20261.6x their median

    Oh how times have changed! https://t.co/5aDnfc3HXT

    174114.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.2x their median

    What if curiosity could make crores? 👀 A mysterious Instagram account, callled 25.august.2026, spent weeks building hype around one date: 25 August 2026. Cryptic videos. Hidden faces. A countdown. And reportedly, 4 lakh+ followers waiting for a “world-changing” reveal. Then came the catch. Followers were redirected to Telegram, where they reportedly had to pay 250 Telegram Stars, roughly ₹500, to unlock the mystery. And the big reveal? An AI-generated motivational video telling people not to waste their time and money on social media. 😭 The irony writes itself. Viral claims suggest anywhere from ₹5 crore to ₹8.5 crore may have been collected, while even larger estimates have circulated online. However, the actual number of paying users and total amount collected remain unverified. Scam or an insanely effective marketing stunt? Would you have paid ₹500 to see the reveal? 👇

    6132111K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20261.8x their median

    Isn't it lovely? 😋 https://t.co/vGoik0eqY1

    125014.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai#ethereum#zec

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 4.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.197% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163 interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #ethereum, #zec.

What is Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights's engagement rate on X?
Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights (@Crowdfire) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,590,647 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Crowdfire - Daily News & Insights sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Crowdfire have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Crowdfire post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going