Back to @Crimsix's profile

OpTic Crimsix engagement report

@Crimsix - 3.0M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 3.0M followers
Per impression
0.594%
70K views on a typical post
Reach
2.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
416
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 416 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 0.594% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 218x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #thunderpickwc.

Compared with accounts its own size

OpTic Crimsix's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, OpTic Crimsix sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 4, 2026218x their median

    Lance Stroll tried a somewhat unconventional driving style during today’s sprint race https://t.co/bPQGOTN8wp

    17K3792883142.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202520x their median

    Took a huge leap of faith going into something new, but I knew I wanted more than anything to get into Motorsports. I didn’t think it’d be possible, and I’m so fortunate and lucky to meet up with RAFA Racing. Getting back on my content grind. From racing life, tips and tricks for weight loss, teaching driving technique in a simplified fashion, and getting back to my roots of FPS. Grind starts now 🫡

    7.6K440739712K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202615x their median

    Scariest moment of my racing career thus far. A reality check in a sense to the dangers of this sport. https://t.co/74Wude44D9

    6.7K118482524K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202616x their median

    I don’t know if anyone noticed it, but year after year, I’m getting absolutely massacred in these Legacy matches. Literally 0-5 match count 🤣, gotta get one on the board.

    6.5K54490252K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 202684x their median

    FIRST PODIUM OF THE YEAR! 🥳 Been a really tough year thus far but all of that hard work and awareness within work ethic is starting to pay off. Pace is improving every weekend and now we can fight. Really enjoy it out here at Watkins Glen, and even more so with this incredible team over at RAFA Racing. Shoutout to my teammate, Chloe for bringing it home after carnage was occurring in both stints.

    5.1K127855176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202612x their median

    9 years ago today... Our First Call of Duty World Championship 🏆 @scump @FormaL @DKarma @Crimsix https://t.co/2sQsF5ZMHS

    4.7K3043823151K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202612x their median

    The Porter eating a Porterhouse. @Crimsix https://t.co/n71keL2408

    4.6K35191155K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20269.9x their median

    I was actually mad MAD today And Pam had me rolling when I watched this back 🤣😭 https://t.co/4yT7GKUSwd

    4.0K68181175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20269.6x their median

    LAST TO FIRST! CANNOT BELIEVE WE’VE DONE IT! P1!! Incredible weekend for us, finishing P1 in Race 2, P2 in Race 1. A much needed win. Unbelievable drive from my teammate Chloe to get the win after I got forced off and 720’d the car in a straight line on Lap 1. Went from P14 to P10 by Turn 6 on the first lap. Was digging hard to get as many positions as I could back, even passing on pit entry. Got out of the car pretty pissed and thought that we didn’t have a chance but Chloe just kept climbing all the way to first, making the final pass on the outside of Canada corner.

    3.8K93505160K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 202658x their median

    “3 inches isn’t a lot” “Yes, it is” -Me at 140mph https://t.co/mbpZJDFbiP

    3.6K4682161K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#thunderpickwc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 416 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 0.594% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 218x its own typical post.

What is OpTic Crimsix's engagement rate on X?
OpTic Crimsix (@Crimsix) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,980,636 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, OpTic Crimsix sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Crimsix have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Crimsix post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going