Back to @Criminalsimpson's profile

Criminalsimpsons engagement report

@Criminalsimpson - 260K followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.23%
of 260K followers
Per impression
6.93%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
17.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.175%
81 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.03/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 1.23%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 6.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Criminalsimpsons's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.23%, Criminalsimpsons sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 48 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 6, 202516x their median

    She sits at your table, what do you do? https://t.co/RsTEpsKtZv

    37K83110K3.2K33M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.9x their median

    A rare childhood picture of Franklin discovered at his Aunt Denise's house in GTA 5 https://t.co/8HOuh1v4Jf

    25K5231241315.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.5x their median

    Hand-drawn cel from The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson, donated to the National September 11 Memorial & Museum. https://t.co/ph1rtHzYx8

    16K1.3K4027213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.4x their median

    https://t.co/rBDjgW3VHM

    17K4081922484K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.3x their median

    https://t.co/L5uXocXKqC

    15K1.4K31110211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.9x their median

    https://t.co/2RwUxIxNIn

    12K7083315116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.9x their median

    https://t.co/20u3IA0w8l

    12K528287171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.5x their median

    🚨🗣️ 🇬🇧 David Beckham on why Alex Ferguson changed his jersey number: “I remember being on holiday in Malta and my phone rang. It was the boss. ‘We’re signing Teddy Sheringham. We’re taking the number 10.’ And I was like, ‘No, boss. I had a great season in this number 10.’ ‘No, doesn’t matter. See you in a few weeks, David.’ And that was it. Then I arrived back at training and the boss said, ‘By the way, you’ve got number seven.’ And I was like, ‘The number seven of Cantona, Bryan Robson and George Best.’ I never felt the pressure. I was just so happy to actually wear number seven. When I moved to Real Madrid, number seven was already taken. I would never even think about asking for it. I would never have got it anyway. So I just said, ‘I’m a huge fan of Jordan. I’ve always loved him. Can I have 23?’ They said, ‘Yeah, you can have 23.’ And that’s how it all started. But then when I went to Milan, 23 wasn’t available. Number seven wasn’t available. I also loved Magic Johnson, who wore 32. So I took number 32, and I had that for Milan and then for PSG.” ❤️⚽️

    11K31035241.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.1x their median

    https://t.co/ybklAYuPsh

    9.4K567236111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.9x their median

    https://t.co/Fy3xDYzQ5k

    8.9K401105105K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 1.23%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 6.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Criminalsimpsons's engagement rate on X?
Criminalsimpsons (@Criminalsimpson) has an engagement rate of 1.23%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 260,148 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.23%, Criminalsimpsons sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Criminalsimpson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Criminalsimpson post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going