CrediBULL Crypto engagement report
@CredibleCrypto - 482K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 472 interactions against 482K followers, an engagement rate of 0.098%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #altcoins, #crypto, #defi.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #altcoins, #crypto, #defi.
Compared with accounts its own size
CrediBULL Crypto's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.098%, CrediBULL Crypto sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 20263.7x their median
Arguably the most important update on crypto I've made in years. The move that we saw over the last 48 hours has ignited a rally that has been 5+ years in the making. This is what you've been waiting for. Enjoy. https://t.co/pRYNHODYmH https://t.co/XhBtvjep4N
- Aug 23, 20262.5x their median
Nice little range forming on bitcoin:native here... https://t.co/oWASObFxn3
- Aug 22, 20262.3x their median
Forgot to mention, but my newest Youtube video obviously covers bitcoin:native and $ETH, but it also covers a number of alts including ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52, $CVX, $HBAR, $XRP, and $TRAC. If you haven't watched it yet- I wasn't exaggerating when I said it was the most important vid I've made in the last couple of years. Go watch it now! (link is in my pinned post)
- Feb 16, 20261.9x their median
https://t.co/fxsBqKnwUK
- Aug 26, 20261.6x their median
Starting to think that the $3 region on $CVX that I have as my initial target may not offer much in the way of resistance and we may head for the range highs at $8+ quicker than expected. Primary reason is because the CVX/CRV pairing looks quite bullish here, implying that it may be time for a bit of outperformance on $CVX relative to $CRV. On the other hand, CRV is printing clearly impulsive PA, while CVX is clearly still trapped in our range, with no indication of impulsive PA just yet. This makes me believe the window of outperformance on CVX may just be during this move through the range highs at $8+ and then CRV probably takes the reigns back for a bit. A 100+% outperformance on CVX to the range highs of $8+ would put $CRV in the .60-.70 region, which lines up nicely with our next short term target zone.
- Aug 23, 2026
On ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 LTF, I'm not sure which scenario we will get, so have a plan that accounts for both. Key is that the origin of our impulse at .20 remains our HTF inval for now- longs with stops below that level should be safe. Anything with stops above that level could technically be at risk in the event of a larger correction on $BTC or the market as a whole. In the meantime, be sure to watch my new Youtube vid (pinned post) if you haven't already!
- Aug 25, 2026
I don't want you guys to FOMO. That is literally the number 1 rule of trading and investing- don't fomo. I get the appeal of the social trading apps- but when they are purposefully engineered to make you act on emotion (which drives up fees, engagement, and profit for the app and those posting on it) they likely do more harm than good imo. Holding an undervalued, high conviction asset for months (or years) that could comfortably yield you a 20, 30 or 50x is already challenging enough for most people. Now imagine holding that asset on an app like FOMO where you're constantly being bombarded by notifications to entice you into dumping your high conviction, long term holds to chase/gamble on random "flavor of the day" plays (many of which are bundled slop). I've thought about starting a port of "long term holds" on the app, just to track their progress and appreciation off of these macro lows publicly- but even in that case- what's the point? Being on that app literally introduces a million distractions (even if you're not actively trading your bags) to those following you and makes it 10x less likely that they will hold on to their high conviction holds long enough to actually realize their potential. The app is not designed for HODL'ers, it's designed to make you do anything but HODL, it's designed to make you FOMO. Would love to hear some perspectives/opinions from those that are making longer term investments there- because personally I don't see it as a net positive atm myself.
- Aug 25, 2026
Like BTC, the LTF wave count on $ETH gets tricky as we approach these highs, but $ETH also seems to be forming a local range here which implies that we have likely completed the first 5 wave impulse off of our lows and are now in a corrective subwave. This could technically be just like the last- that is a tight, sideways consolidation- or it could lead to a deeper pullback. Things look relatively healthy under the hood overall- so no strong bias can be developed off of that info either here imo. For now, watching to see how PA around this range develops, and expecting a sweep of the highs before either further consolidation, or a bit of a deeper dip.
- Aug 26, 2026
Our new Universal Token Ratings dashboard is live: the industry's first continuously updated token rating standard, built with @Forgd_. 100+ tokens now carry a single 0-100 score and AAA-CCC grade, live on DefiLlama. https://t.co/7bwDtq5DmE
- Aug 26, 2026
Just saw The Odyssey, i know im a little late to the party but highly recommend!
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 472 interactions against 482K followers, an engagement rate of 0.098%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #altcoins, #crypto, #defi.
- What is CrediBULL Crypto's engagement rate on X?
- CrediBULL Crypto (@CredibleCrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.098%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 481,635 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.098%, CrediBULL Crypto sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CredibleCrypto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CredibleCrypto post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.