Covalent engagement report
@Covalent_HQ - 230K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.272% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Covalent's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Covalent sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 14, 20269.4x their median
https://t.co/cWjLoHF6bY
- Sep 8, 2026
$2.2M in tokenized Circle TVL. New ATH. CRCL sold off Sep 1, then jumped after Heath Tarbert’s GENIUS Act testimony on Sep 3. TVL stepped up the next day and held at $2.2M through Sep 7. Arc’s Sep 16 mainnet launch is still ahead. https://t.co/fRCJMuaKVR
- Sep 9, 2026
$26.9M of tokenized META transfers hit Robinhood. Sep 8 was the first $20M+ day, even though cash META closed around $613, down 0.5%. The spike came as Meta announced Muse and settled with 51 state AGs on teen safety. The wrapper moved on the headlines, not the stock. https://t.co/5S23PlhA63
- Sep 9, 2026
50.2K holders now hold tokenized MSFT on Robinhood. The Sep 3 Mag7 bid brought the latest wave of inflows, but transfers are now down 33%. Holders are still up 17% WoW, meaning the wallets that came in during that move are largely staying. https://t.co/HQEmrsY0nZ
- Sep 10, 2026
$1.6M of gas just hit Base in a single day. Gas was flat through Sep 8, then jumped 1,078% WoW as Coinbase brought tokenized stocks including Tesla, Microsoft, Amazon and SpaceX to Base. Base had already crossed 10.5M transactions. The next session turned that activity into its first $1M+ gas day.
- Sep 9, 2026
SBI VC Trade and BITPOINT are delisting APT in Japan. Did that actually affect the market? APT realized PnL hit a new high at $332.6K on Hyperliquid after staying flat-to-negative all week. Volume fell 23%, fees 18%, while liquidations jumped 1,400%. APT is still +16.3% on the week, so I’m reading this more as a short squeeze than fresh positioning.
- Sep 9, 2026
$2.3M of tokenized CoreWeave transfers just hit Robinhood. That is the second spike this week. Sep 4 was the first, and Sep 8 brought another as CRWV jumped 11.7% alongside the neocloud trade. https://t.co/7a2CayDChN
- Sep 9, 2026
SOPH just crossed $100K in realized PnL on Hyperliquid. Upbit suspended SOPH deposits and withdrawals the same day as the ~106% move, while fees jumped 7,794%. The PnL spike looks like shorts getting squeezed into the migration. Data from GoldRush https://t.co/4OIYQCRQZX
- Sep 8, 2026
DAI trading volume hit $839B in 30-day volume. Almost $680B of that came in a single Sep 5–6 spike, right alongside the $22.71B USDS mint and $129B DAI burn. DAI supply is still only ~$4.6B. The volume spike is the migration pipe turning over. https://t.co/XhyHinM0vl
- Sep 28, 2026
A $150B buyback announcement just moved NVIDIA’s stock by roughly 2%. The tokenized NVDA market tracked the same move, showing how quickly major TradFi events are now reflected in onchain markets. https://t.co/1fph4CLW1e
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.272% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.
- What is Covalent's engagement rate on X?
- Covalent (@Covalent_HQ) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 230,155 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Covalent sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Covalent_HQ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Covalent_HQ post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.