Back to @CorteConstEcu's profile

Corte Constitucional engagement report

@CorteConstEcu - 153K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 153K followers
Per impression
0.499%
2.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.499% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 58% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 150 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #protegemosderechos, #boletínjurisprudencialec, #novedadjurisprudencialcc.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #protegemosderechos, #boletínjurisprudencialec, #novedadjurisprudencialcc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Corte Constitucional's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Corte Constitucional sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link38% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 258 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202611x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La Corte Constitucional declaró constitucional el artículo 282.3 del COFJ sobre la obligación de citación y notificación durante la investigación previa.  👉🏽 Sentencia 45-23-IN/26: https://t.co/GN5eJbex6y https://t.co/SkrkPUIGjm

    81582933K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20267.7x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La Corte Constitucional determinó que es constitucional el límite de cinco años para acceder a la suspensión condicional de la pena.  👉🏽 Sentencia 9-23-IN/26: https://t.co/gDCtS4fFjk https://t.co/B8Jxo9RYue

    66362415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.4x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La Corte Constitucional determinó que presentar sucesivamente acciones de protección sobre un mismo conflicto vulnera la garantía de non bis in ídem.  👉🏽 Sentencia 1532-25-EP/26: https://t.co/7taN9eHOPU https://t.co/5XHdBrBDyc

    5025105.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.1x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC| La Corte determinó que, excepcionalmente, una medida ordenada en una sentencia puede ser declarada inejecutable cuando su cumplimiento contradice de forma expresa y manifiesta el ordenamiento jurídico.  👉🏽Sentencia 115-24-IS/26: https://t.co/zgpfywux0M https://t.co/5dPhSNJei3

    3621104.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.5x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La @CorteConstEcu determinó que la incorporación del Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas (MEF) para viabilizar medidas de reparación no implica atribuirle responsabilidad por la vulneración de derechos.  👉🏽Sentencia 197-23-EP/26: https://t.co/YoaAhMoI78 https://t.co/pIKslXN22k

    3314114.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.3x their median

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La @CorteConstEcu determinó que la falta de tramitación y calificación de una acusación particular puede vulnerar el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva, en su componente de acceso a la justicia.  👉🏽Sentencia 2939-25-EP/26: https://t.co/tM6VUgLuQl https://t.co/ybs0WzaiPi

    3212205.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.1x their median

    El acceso sin consentimiento al contenido del celular de una adolescente y su exposición frente a sus compañeros, mediante discursos basados en estereotipos de género, dieron lugar a una acción de protección. https://t.co/5EpX4J2b1O

    1910102.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.0x their median

    🔵 ACTUALÍZATE | #BoletínJurisprudencialEc Septiembre 2026 Conoce las decisiones emitidas en el mes por la @CorteConstEcu y sus principales criterios jurisprudenciales. https://t.co/7kTIQeSqno

    179202.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    #AgendaInternacionalCC | La vicepresidenta Karla Andrade Quevedo y las juezas constitucionales Alejandra Cárdenas Reyes, Claudia Salgado Levy y Sandra Cordero Gárate mantuvieron una reunión de trabajo con autoridades de la Corte Constitucional de Luxemburgo. https://t.co/MMbBrD5MC9

    154103.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    #NovedadJurisprudencialCC | La @CorteConstEcu determinó la constitucionalidad de la reforma a la Ordenanza de los Planes de Desarrollo, Ordenamiento Territorial y Uso y Gestión de Suelo del cantón Loja. 👉🏽Sentencia 92-22-IN/26: https://t.co/8u7Mnmcm06 https://t.co/72RSE5yTol

    144103.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#protegemosderechos#boletínjurisprudencialec#novedadjurisprudencialcc#agendainternacionalcc#audienciapúblicacc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.499% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 58% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 150 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #protegemosderechos, #boletínjurisprudencialec, #novedadjurisprudencialcc.

What is Corte Constitucional's engagement rate on X?
Corte Constitucional (@CorteConstEcu) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 152,668 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Corte Constitucional sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CorteConstEcu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CorteConstEcu post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going