Back to @Coredao_Org's profile

Core DAO šŸ”¶ engagement report

@Coredao_Org - 2.3M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.056%
of 2.3M followers
Per impression
1.32%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
4.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Core DAO šŸ”¶'s engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.056%, Core DAO šŸ”¶ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 1, 2026

    Most people will not onboard to Bitcoin through a staking dashboard. They will onboard through something that feels like Robinhood. @sat_pay will bring millions to Core. šŸ”¶ https://t.co/cXobBIQsuT

    1.1K5232626865K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    CORE has a permanently fixed supply of 2.1 billion tokens. CORE is used for staking, Dual Staking, gas, collateral, and more. As demand for CORE grows, its supply remains fixed.

    1.2K30223632214K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2026

    Core does not need one product to carry the whole story. It has a full Bitcoin finance roadmap. Retail, institutions, agents, RWAs, yield, payments. All roads lead back to CORE. šŸ”¶ https://t.co/Kfb0e1wCfg

    1.0K3212493152K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 2026

    Record number of CORE tokens staked šŸ”¶ Holders continue to double down on security and yield šŸ” https://t.co/ABiVdSnp2A

    1.0K30920937161K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 2026

    Bitcoin won as the asset. The next fight is making it usable. Core is turning Bitcoin finance into something people can actually use on a daily basis. šŸ”¶

    1.0K3212103457K viewsView on X
  • May 29, 2026

    The next wave of Bitcoin products will look very different. Neobanks. ETPs. RWAs. Institutional yield. CORE is the infrastructure underneath. šŸ”¶ https://t.co/t1FqnqFOj2

    9983181883952K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026

    Core has run at 100% uptime while Bitcoin products plugged in and started generating real revenue. Continuous operation is the prerequisite for all of it. https://t.co/cNkRCvFoHI

    1.1K29014735141K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026

    CORE continues to make Bitcoin more powerful: → Faster Bitcoin-secured rails. → Self-custodial Bitcoin yield. → Growing Bitcoin financial products.

    89426229027114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Core is the infrastructure Bitcoin products plug into. Payments, lending, collateral, yield. CORE will continue to grow based on Bitcoin utility. https://t.co/5pWezeR17n

    1.0K25615726112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026

    Growing coredaoorg:native holding and staking means higher yields, greater utility, and a stronger network. The tide is rising šŸ”¶

    99526915732112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions.

What is Core DAO šŸ”¶'s engagement rate on X?
Core DAO šŸ”¶ (@Coredao_Org) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,311,228 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.056%, Core DAO šŸ”¶ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Coredao_Org have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Coredao_Org post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going