Back to @CopelandNetwork's profile

Kenneth Copeland engagement report

@CopelandNetwork - 641K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 641K followers
Per impression
2.71%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
113
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 113 interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.651% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kenneth Copeland's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Kenneth Copeland sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 227 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 20264.3x their median

    From day one to one day. 59 years of faithfulness. 59 years of leadership. 59 years of building. https://t.co/BiRWPxt4ta

    444271049.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.9x their median

    Prayer works when it is backed by faith. Faith believes God’s Word before the answer is seen. When you pray, settle it in your heart that God is faithful, His Word is true and His promises can be trusted. https://t.co/zls2RtSccL

    347632328.9K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 2026

    The seasons may change, but the message never does: God loves you, we love you, and Jesus is Lord. https://t.co/GCQ3hbqGxl

    20218915.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    Faith comes by hearing the Word again and again. The more you hear it, speak it, and believe it, the stronger your faith becomes. Today, make the Word your confession. Fill your heart and your mouth with God’s promises for healing, and expect His Word to work in your life. https://t.co/s7gnrt7Dvb

    141571617.4K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20261.9x their median

    Sometimes the “new thing” God is doing doesn’t arrive wrapped in ease — it grows quietly through the stretching, the waiting, and the rebuilding. If this season has felt heavy, don’t lose heart. God is still making rivers in deserts and bringing life to dry places. https://t.co/e3VKiaFHZM

    149401913.5K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20261.8x their median

    Confession of faith over your body. https://t.co/w3URaQp4av

    164311303.2K viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 2026

    When God says “there’s more,” He’s not talking about someday—He means now. Step into it. Believe it. Receive it. https://t.co/paxz1iFSrn

    162201412.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.7x their median

    Strong roots produce lasting fruit. Real spiritual growth isn’t about striving to look fruitful. It’s about remaining in Jesus and allowing Him to transform you from the inside out. “Remain in me, as I also remain in you.” — John 15:4 https://t.co/RCiTLgmeDP

    140451106.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.7x their median

    Want to grow as a Christian? Don’t focus on producing the fruit; focus on growing your roots. Get rooted in God’s Word. Know who you are in Christ. Put His Word into practice. Stay connected to Jesus. Stay planted in church. https://t.co/s7llGbynIk

    144381136.0K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 2026

    Faith isn’t something you get—it’s something you use. What you focus on grows. So drop fear, speak truth, and act on what God said. Hear → Believe → Speak → Act. Faith is already in you—use it. https://t.co/1lVfaFbXHb

    139371803.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 113 interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.651% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

What is Kenneth Copeland's engagement rate on X?
Kenneth Copeland (@CopelandNetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 640,797 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Kenneth Copeland sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CopelandNetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CopelandNetwork post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going