Complex Bets engagement report
@ComplexBets - 556K followers on X
Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 214x its own typical post.
Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tag: #thingsyoulovetosee.
Compared with accounts its own size
Complex Bets's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Complex Bets sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.694% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 99% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 2, 2026214x their median
Did you know that โฆ (๐ธ: Getty) https://t.co/ND10xxf4KU
- Jun 14, 2026100x their median
Sometimes in life, captions are irrelevant ๐๐งก๐ https://t.co/QfVONjQycb
- Oct 12, 202612x their median
Complex on the Scene went international to link up with Nikola Jokic in his hometown of Sombor ๐ @ComplexSports | @FanaticsSports | @Sprite | @Ben_Felderstein ๐ Listen to the 3x MVP's insights on the upcoming NBA campaign, horse racing, Ant Edwards & more ... https://t.co/gHzVedd975
- Sep 14, 20267.4x their median
Saquon did not sugarcoat it ๐ญ (๐ธ: Getty/ via @NFL ) https://t.co/DyJ2m4SZbg
- Sep 14, 20267.3x their median
For the first time in 17 years both the Jets and Giants go 1-0 ๐คฏ (๐ธ: Getty) https://t.co/seF10GYUG1
- Sep 15, 20265.6x their median
Oh no it's happening again ... (๐ธ: Getty) https://t.co/M1aWskxaKl
- Sep 2, 20265.3x their median
Micah has all the faith in the world in his guy ๐ค๐ง Fanatics Sportsbook odds subject to change. (๐ธ: Getty) https://t.co/8a7NWbEW1N
- Sep 13, 20264.8x their median
7๏ธโฃ lead changes so far in Bills-Texans โฆ https://t.co/rc0VqTsLw4
- Aug 25, 20264.6x their median
Fantasy Football managers, beware ๐ป (๐ธ: Getty) https://t.co/d5FX0Oqdcs
- Sep 4, 20264.5x their median
A BUFFALO BLOCK ๐ฅ https://t.co/uJUYlw1ZKx
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 214x its own typical post.
- What is Complex Bets's engagement rate on X?
- Complex Bets (@ComplexBets) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 77 original posts from the last 30 days against 555,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Complex Bets sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ComplexBets have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ComplexBets post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.