Back to @Common_Planet's profile

Common Planet Foundation engagement report

@Common_Planet - 46K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.006%
of 46K followers
Per impression
0.688%
436 views on a typical post
Reach
0.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Posts are seen about 436 times each, and 0.688% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.943% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 4706x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Common Planet Foundation sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 24, 20264706x their median

    According to our Constitution, we should have overthrown our government by now.

    12K1.8K201771.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 20262558x their median

    “In 1903, the biggest industry in the world was whaling. It disappeared almost overnight.” Jimmy Carr dropped this on the Joe Rogan podcast and it made me rethink how fast entire economies can vanish. Whaling collapsed in about 18 months once petrochemicals replaced whale oil. The same thing happened with horse manure in New York City — the streets were literally covered in it, brownstones had steps to stay above the filth, and laws couldn’t fix it. Then Henry Ford’s cars arrived, and within a few years the horses (and the problem) were basically gone. Carr’s point: the resources and industries we treat as permanent today can disappear shockingly fast when something better comes along. What “essential” industry or resource of today do you think could vanish in the next 20 years?

    6.7K546411441.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 20171532x their median

    What is a Society where huge tax-evading, profit driven multi-national Corporations run by an Oligarchy rule the Planet? It's not democracy https://t.co/XqbZ5v6k9M

    3.1K1.2K13369View on X
  • Mar 24, 2026590x their median

    Mo Salah transformed his village, Nagrig, in Egypt 🇪🇬 by building a hospital, school, youth center, and ambulance unit. Salah supports poor families by giving £3,500 monthly to help alleviate poverty. He constructed a $450,000 water treatment plant to provide clean drinking water for his community. During the Covid-19 lockdown, he donated food worth $500,000 to assist his people in Nagrig. In 2019, he contributed £2.5 million towards cancer treatment in Egypt. His ambulance unit serves 30,000 residents, improving access to emergency medical care. Mohamed Salah donated oxygen tanks to help combat Covid-19 fatalities in his village. He gave £50,000 to Tanta University Hospital to acquire modern medical equipment.

    1.5K29716542K viewsView on X
  • Mar 23, 20265.0x their median

    This is the best article we've ever written: Creditism: From Debt to Freedom Part 3: The architecture of liberation https://t.co/MXlFWvL16Y "You were never meant to pay for your own existence. You were born to be free… not to be a cost of labor in someone else’s ledger."

    11310273 viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 20265.0x their median

    Banks don't lend money. They create it. And they've captured the legal right to do it as debt, with interest, forever. Every price you pay contains layers of tribute to owners of the capital and the credit. https://t.co/tin9CLI8fW Part 2 of How Money Really Works The Definitive Guide to Credit, Debt & the Illusion of Scarcity The Money Trick — How Banks Captured the Ledger

    9510256 viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20263.3x their median

    Why sovereign money is not debt, a very good article: https://t.co/ktweCYGY0e

    7210363 viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20262.0x their median

    You didn’t opt into this system. You were born into it. Every dollar you’ve ever spent was permission. Permission to eat, to live somewhere, to move through the world. Every transaction of your life has been authorized... The Trust Revolution, Part 4: Why Creditism Couldn't Exist Until Now. https://t.co/yeeqfmN1l9

    4200262 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.7x their median

    A goat can settle a debt. Nothing settles a deed. Pay rent for twenty years and the title is as strong as on day one. A mortgage is repaid and the money is deleted. The position it bought is permanent. New essay: House Rules https://t.co/xn22Q5YPgx

    4100688 viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 2026

    https://t.co/Jz8BoNbLzA

    2200286 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Posts are seen about 436 times each, and 0.688% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.943% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 4706x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Common Planet Foundation's engagement rate on X?
Common Planet Foundation (@Common_Planet) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 46,246 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Common Planet Foundation sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Common_Planet have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Common_Planet post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going