Back to @ColhashimDogar's profile

Hashim Dogar engagement report

@ColhashimDogar - 263K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 263K followers
Per impression
0.756%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.756% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 391x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hashim Dogar's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Hashim Dogar sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 128 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 2026391x their median

    So I’m curious to know. How is Godi media covering the aftermath?

    12K1.1K1.4K184311K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026360x their median

    नई फ़िल्म “श्री रामभूमि” की शूटिंग का आज अयोध्या में पहला दिन है! श्री राममंदिर में जाकर रामलला से आशीर्वाद लिया! अपने, अपने परिवार/दोस्तों के लिए, फ़िल्म के लिए और आप सबके लिए भी! सुखद अनुभूति हुई! देश विदेश से आए हज़ारो राम भक्तों के साथ “जय श्री राम” की पुकार लगाई! 🕉🙏😍 #ShriRambhoomi #JaiShriRam @zeestudiosofficial

    10K1.5K1.9K214207K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026333x their median

    پنجاب کے تمام پی ٹی آئی ورکرز سے اپیل ہے کہ جو فورسز پنجاب کے مختلف مقامات پر لانگ مارچ کو روکنے کے لیے تعینات کی گئی ہیں، ان کے کھانے پینے اور رہائش کا خیال رکھا کریں۔ یہ بھی ہمارے ہی بھائی ہیں، ان کے ساتھ حسنِ سلوک اور اخلاق کا مظاہرہ کریں۔

    10.0K2.2K40084106K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026300x their median

    https://t.co/tgsl0XpN9L

    10.0K1.2K20076341K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 2026192x their median

    ایک بات ہم نے بلکل واضح طور پر کہنی ہوگی۔ پاکستان افواج کیلئے ہے یا افواج پاکستان کیلئے ہیں؟ جب تک یہ فیصلہ نہیں ہوتا پاکستان کا کوئی مسئلہ حل نہیں ہوگا۔

    5.6K1.4K30459119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2026134x their median

    🚨 Obama also believes that India is on the brink of a genocide and that the country is on the verge of collapse and disintegration. The signs of India becoming a failed state are increasingly visible, and people around the world are seeing them more clearly than ever. https://t.co/cJh008hoCe

    3.8K1.0K24489448K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 2026112x their median

    The fact Labour have approved £153million aid for Pakistan when they are refusing to take back Shabir Ahmed tells you all you need to know. No surprise that Labour slipped this out on the last day of this session of Parliament – so nobody can hold them to account. The Labour Government is failing to keep the British public safe. It is outrageous that they are handing taxpayers' money over to a foreign government which blocks us deporting dangerous and violent criminals to them. https://t.co/gwQoei6HGR

    3.1K78135866387K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202674x their median

    “… we’re not Pakistan ….. we’re not scared…” A slap on 🇵🇰 face … Pakistan is almost a DEROGATORY term now … @zeshmohmand @sabine_kayani @MoeedNj @soldierspeaks https://t.co/ZjntNwPwJF

    1.8K523289147450K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202663x their median

    Punjab’s forests are now protected around the clock through cutting-edge technology. At the Punjab Forest Department’s GIS Lab, our green cover is monitored from the sky and from space using AI-powered drones, satellite imagery, and a modern command and control centre tracking every acre in real time. 🌲 Instant detection of illegal cutting, encroachments, and forest fires 🌲 Satellite monitoring through Landsat, Sentinel, SPOT, and WorldView 🌲 Smarter protection for our natural heritage Our forests are a national trust. Every innovation strengthens their protection and safeguards Punjab’s green future for generations to come. Plant a tree today and become a partner in building a greener Punjab for future generations. #GreenPunjab #PlantATree

    1.6K62011124717K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202637x their median

    اس دولہا بے دلہن کو لینے کیلئے جانےوالی بارات کا رخ واپس موڑ دیا اور شادی سے انکار کردیا. اس نے اس بات کی جو وجوہات بتائیں وہ آپ بھی سنیں اور بتائیں کہ کیا اس نے درست فیصلہ کیا؟ میرے نزدیک بروقت درست فیصلہ کیا. https://t.co/sidNhqlkOR

    99726311222147K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.756% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 391x its own typical post.

What is Hashim Dogar's engagement rate on X?
Hashim Dogar (@ColhashimDogar) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,953 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Hashim Dogar sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ColhashimDogar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ColhashimDogar post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going