Back to @Cognizant's profile

Cognizant engagement report

@Cognizant - 704K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 704K followers
Per impression
0.54%
3.7K views on a typical post
Reach
0.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 704K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.526% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158 interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #time100, #cognizantnewdelhimarathon2027, #runwithcognizant.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #time100, #cognizantnewdelhimarathon2027, #runwithcognizant.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cognizant's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Cognizant sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link79% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 79% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 438 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 20267.9x their median

    The future of AI depends on who has access to it. That's why Cognizant joined @raiseus_ai and expanded its Synapse commitment to reach 2 million people by 2030, supporting AI education and workforce development. The next few years will be shaped not only by what AI can do, but by who has the opportunity to use it. Read more: https://t.co/78EYjamr2p

    5412444889K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20265.1x their median

    .@cristianoamon, CEO of Qualcomm, is responsible for steering the 41-year-old communications company through a pivotal moment. He recently joined TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs on our new interview series ‘The CEO Moment’ to talk about his trip to China with President Trump, where AI is heading next, and how he plans to keep his company competitive. Watch the full episode here: https://t.co/LBWcvbHibR

    581921447K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.8x their median

    We are proud to share Cognizant CEO @imravikumars has been named to the #TIME100AI list for the second consecutive year, recognizing the leaders shaping AI’s future on a global scale. Read more about this recognition: https://t.co/uXsesMwUNi https://t.co/8RqFmWFBj2

    6013193353K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.7x their median

    A nice moment in Times Square. Thank you to @Nasdaq for recognizing Cognizant following our inclusion in @TIME's World's Best Companies 2026 list. We're grateful to our associates, clients and partners who make achievements like this possible. https://t.co/tBtMQfVjci

    627059.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    Cognizant is creating a new class of AI-era roles, including Frontier Certified Engineers and Frontier Business Operators. Backed by 15,000+ Claude certifications and 5,000 OpenAI Codex certifications, we're building the talent needed to design, deploy and manage AI systems at scale. Read more: https://t.co/uiy0DBE4WV

    3385015K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.0x their median

    Cognizant #Q2FY26 numbers are in. The results reflect new partnerships taking shape, consistent growth and meaningful advances across our AI and technology platforms. Take a look at some of the highlights below. ⬇️ Check out our news release for additional details: https://t.co/3xPwWg9mRB

    2213508.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.0x their median

    Cognizant is on pace to hire 1,500 U.S. college graduates in 2026, with roles that will span across our core tech business, Belcan engineering unit and our new Frontier Engineers track for early-career AI talent: https://t.co/DtmR6z0jOz https://t.co/qu0fxb6z3d

    1721202.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.9x their median

    Many organizations have proven AI can work. The hard part is getting it to work repeatedly and at scale. "The organizations seeing the greatest success treat AI as an operating model, not a technology demonstration." Insights from Pramod Bijani, Senior Vice President - Platform Group (Engineering), Cognizant, on platform engineering, AI agents, and scaling AI across the enterprise: https://t.co/gPrVFBYPEm

    892115.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.9x their median

    We are proud to announce Cognizant has been named to @TIME's America's Best Companies 2026 list in the ranking's inaugural edition. We were recognized among 1,000 top-performing companies, evaluated across employee satisfaction, financial performance and sustainability transparency: https://t.co/lyuBcrzJ7K

    22105220K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.9x their median

    Cognizant #Q2FY26 results are in. ➡️ Revenue of $5.5 billion increased 4.5% YOY ➡️ Operating margin of 15.9% increased 30 basis points YOY ➡️ Adjusted Operating Margin of 16.0% increased 40 basis points YOY ➡️ Trailing 12-month bookings of $29.1 billion, increased 5% YOY See our news release for additional details and important information: https://t.co/dqwlQSTjPD

    249235.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#time100#cognizantnewdelhimarathon2027#runwithcognizant

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 704K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.526% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158 interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #time100, #cognizantnewdelhimarathon2027, #runwithcognizant.

What is Cognizant's engagement rate on X?
Cognizant (@Cognizant) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 704,316 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Cognizant sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cognizant have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cognizant post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going