Clara Bennett engagement report
@CodeswithClara - 67K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hyper3d, #rodin, #tonebird.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #hyper3d, #rodin, #tonebird.
Compared with accounts its own size
Clara Bennett's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.046%, Clara Bennett sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1103 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 202684x their median
Sam Altman (CEO of Open AI): "You no longer need to write prompts." In just 38 minutes, he explains how to use ChatGpt at a level that most people can't even imagine. It's talk he gave to stanford students. A friend sent me the recording last night. After watching it, I realized I was only taking advantage of about 15% of what this tool can really do. Watch it in full and then read the guide l leave below on how to create a system that prompts itself.
- Aug 9, 202661x their median
Elon Musk just gave the clearest AI timeline we’ve heard so far. In under 10 minutes he lays out: 1) AI surpasses all human intelligence in ~5 years 2) Humans most likely lose control within 10 years 3) Most probable outcome: an age of amazing abundance 4) “Even if there was a stop button — we probably shouldn’t press it” This is denser and more direct than most hour-long podcasts on the topic. If you still think AI is “just another tool”, this 10-minute segment will recalibrate you.
- Sep 14, 20265.4x their median
I stopped hand modeling dungeons for my roguelike. GPT-6 Astra now plans the whole thing and writes the code. No engine. Just Codex and a browser. When it needs a 3D asset, it calls Hyper3D Rodin MCP and drops the model straight into the scene. Here is the dungeon crawler it built.
- Sep 17, 20262.3x their median
ChatGPT, Claude & Grok are cooking… 🔥 But Gemini? That’s why Gemini is out of the race. https://t.co/UwTIeE4EMW
- Sep 4, 20261.7x their median
The creator of Ruby on Rails just said programmers may be worse at AI coding than people who cannot code. Lex Fridman asked David Heinemeier Hansson directly. His answer: 100%. Because once the AI handles the implementation, knowing how to write a loop is no longer the rare skill. The valuable skills become: What should this product do? Who is it for? What should version one include? What needs to be removed? What should the AI build first? A traditional programmer may tell the agent exactly how to solve the problem. That experience can become a trap. The agent follows the old path instead of finding a better one. Meanwhile, someone who understands users, products, priorities, and taste can describe the desired result and let the agent choose the route. Programming knowledge still matters when the system breaks. But AI is moving the bottleneck away from writing code. The advantage now belongs to the person who knows what should exist, not merely how to implement it. WATCH FULL PODCAST ON Lex fridman YT CHANNEL
- Sep 12, 2026
A Google Cloud engineer just showed how to build a complete app with Claude from scratch. 26 minutes, live on stage, doing what most teams take weeks to ship. Worth more than any $500 vibe-coding course. No team, no setup, just Claude and a goal. The people learning what Claude can actually do are shipping what everyone else outsources to a team.
- Sep 6, 2026
🚨 TRUMP: “Whoever wins AI, wins.” “This is bigger than the internet. This is a revolution.” President Trump goes ALL IN on American innovation, saying the U.S. must beat China in AI as the technology is already driving breakthroughs that are transforming fields like medicine. https://t.co/Vgh8IR3zSx
- Sep 8, 2026
If you love anime, you deserve to know this website exists. Someone built an anime website that puts new episodes, watchlists, and release schedules in one place. It’s called KuroAnime. Open the website, search for a show, or browse what’s airing this season. https://t.co/ugCCe2YY4Q You get: > Latest releases. > Completed series. > Upcoming anime. > Episode schedules. > Watch history. > AniList and MyAnimeList watchlist syncing. There’s also a guest option if you just want to look around. The site says it doesn’t host the video files itself, so playback availability can vary. Your “I’ll watch one episode” plan just got another enemy 🤣
- Sep 9, 2026
GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 for a Coca-Cola brand. Which one performing the best?👇 https://t.co/UmtfV4OQwr
- Sep 1, 2026
BREAKING: AI can now design like Apple-level creative directors (for free). Here are 10 Claude Opus 4.6 prompts that build complete design systems, brand guidelines & 47+ marketing assets in 6 hours: (Designers are already snapping this)
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hyper3d, #rodin, #tonebird.
- What is Clara Bennett's engagement rate on X?
- Clara Bennett (@CodeswithClara) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 67,447 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.046%, Clara Bennett sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CodeswithClara have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CodeswithClara post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.