Back to @CodeByPoonam's profile

Poonam Soni engagement report

@CodeByPoonam - 214K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.073%
of 214K followers
Per impression
0.979%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
7.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
157
interactions (median)
Saved
0.293%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.979% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

Compared with accounts its own size

Poonam Soni's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.073%, Poonam Soni sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,991 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 324 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 20268.1x their median

    Gemini 4 pro in arina vs. GPT-6 Astra max > Gemini 4 Pro beats GPT-6 Astra by a huge margin. > Once it officially drops, it’s game over. https://t.co/x7NYbvJ61d

    1.1K359616238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.8x their median

    1. Open Chatgpt 2. Upload your image 3. Prompt: 'Using my uploaded photo, show me what I would have looked like around 1985. Preserve my identity, facial features, skin tone, age, and recognizable appearance. Reimagine my hair, clothing, accessories, and surroundings with bold, unmistakably mid-1980s styling—expressive silhouettes, statement accessories, layered details, distinctive colors, and textures. Make it feel like a genuine 1985 photograph with analog grain, faded color, direct flash, and subtle softness. Add a period-accurate 1980s red-orange date stamp in the lower corner. No modern objects or text.'

    1.0K187270167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.1x their median

    opus 5.5 is insane i asked it to animate an ai dungeon story and it one shotted this https://t.co/jFFO13rFLv

    8726027348K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20265.1x their median

    If Gemini 4's benchmarks are real, Google just pulled off the biggest comeback in AI history. People are building crazy stuff with the rumored Gemini 4 Pro checkpoint in Arena 10 Wild Examples https://t.co/Fz94ISYXSG

    73714366357K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.5x their median

    Gemini 4 in arena (week back) vs Gemini 4 in arena (now) Gemini 4 new checkpoint upgraded and improved dramatically compared to previous version. >gemini 4 latest checkpoint is absolutely a beast https://t.co/uZbHDsRDl9

    5122016552K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.1x their median

    GPT-6 Astra is a BEAST People are building 3D models, websites, games 10 Wild Examples: https://t.co/dXUkbqrrU7

    2982211259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    It's only been 2 days since OpenAI dropped GPT-6 Astra People are going crazy over its coding capabilities. Here're the 13 wild examples so far (Don't miss the 5th one) https://t.co/QMAI3A18ta

    2442813043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.8x their median

    Gemini 4 Pro new checkpoint vs Claude Opus 5.5 High G4P under the name "gemini-3.8-flash" in Arena Gemini is getting close to opus 5.5 level (not yet) look at this output here > vintage steam starts flying with its sails https://t.co/dIGe7s4F5h

    234835446K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    Claude Fable 5.1 ONE SHOTTED this Call of Duty game. Such a massive leap for game development we’re gonna see so much more from this model in the next few days. Took almost all my weekly limit, but it was worth it. https://t.co/TiAw3QbVpF

    1931825517K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    🚨 The Gemini app is now available for Windows Just press Alt + Space on your PC at any time to open Gemini instantly. https://t.co/n7GctVZSYP

    139611116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai3d#deemostech#hyper3d#pixverseworldmodel#rodin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.979% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

What is Poonam Soni's engagement rate on X?
Poonam Soni (@CodeByPoonam) has an engagement rate of 0.073%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,618 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.073%, Poonam Soni sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CodeByPoonam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CodeByPoonam post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going