Back to @ClydeSSB's profile

Clyde 1 Superscoreboard engagement report

@ClydeSSB - 158K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 158K followers
Per impression
0.204%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
11.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.204% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 997 interactions, about 28x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fulltimeteaser, #beatthepundit, #teamoftheweek.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #fulltimeteaser, #beatthepundit, #teamoftheweek.

Compared with accounts its own size

Clyde 1 Superscoreboard's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Clyde 1 Superscoreboard sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 202628x their median

    🔊 LISTEN: “Ryan’s ankle is a mess”. 🔵 Derek McInnes says Ryan Naderi is a doubt to face Celtic because of Mika Baur’s challenge. 🖥️ McInnes says it’s “strange” the referee wasn’t called to the screen to look at it back ⬇️ https://t.co/vho7CAJaIJ

    6235927639560K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202627x their median

    🔊 LISTEN: “I genuinely will reflect and see. It’s a matter of whether I can help the team”. 🍀 Celtic boss Martin O’Neill says he will reflect on his future over the international break ⬇️ https://t.co/OqcnbAldHj

    6584418982539K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.9x their median

    🔊 LISTEN: “Although we won 1-0, we should’ve scored more and we should’ve added to that”. 🔵 Rangers boss Derek McInnes thinks their victory over Celtic could’ve been even more convincing ⬇️ https://t.co/FLvrFB9DOx

    285824228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.7x their median

    ⚽ FT: Celtic 0-1 Rangers Ryan Naderi's first half strike gives Derek McInnes' side a huge three points with the hosts suffering their third defeat in a week!

    2291172122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20267.2x their median

    ⚽ FT: Celtic 1-3 Ferencvaros It's defeat for Martin O'Neill's men in their opening Europa League match!

    178869328K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20266.8x their median

    🔊 LISTEN: “We are far from rock bottom.” “I get the fact why fans might be asking why the team is led by a 74-year-old… well, when I was 73 we won!” 🍀 Celtic manager Martin O’Neill says this weekend’s derby against Rangers is ‘too early’ to be ‘season defining’. ⬇️ https://t.co/1UV4xviVla

    1821143870K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.1x their median

    😏 "I want them to SUFFER!" This fan expects Rangers to "DESTROY" Celtic this season after Old Firm win. Give us your take on the game tonight from 6pm on 0141 951 1025 📞 https://t.co/A0fksPUc9m

    1691138123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20266.1x their median

    🔵 "Jim Gillespie spoke to Willie Collum and the SFA about it... I’m really not happy with the challenge". Derek McInnes says Rangers contacted the SFA over Mika Baur's challenge that has left Ryan Naderi a doubt for Sunday's Old Firm ⬇️ https://t.co/Nc7HvclWqq https://t.co/ZIp8gPrDdm

    115794334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.4x their median

    🥅 33' Goal - Rangers! Ryan Naderi scores the rebound after Minsu Kim's shot was saved! Celtic 0-1 Rangers https://t.co/ldtT3OpZwQ

    173713118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.1x their median

    🎥 WATCH: “If we’re going to get the best out of our best players… we’re going to have to find another way”. 🍀 Martin O’Neill says he’s still working out his best Celtic team and admits some new players are still learning the demands of the club ⬇️ https://t.co/Mb09K1kGLk

    9886315113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fulltimeteaser#beatthepundit#teamoftheweek

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.204% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 997 interactions, about 28x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fulltimeteaser, #beatthepundit, #teamoftheweek.

What is Clyde 1 Superscoreboard's engagement rate on X?
Clyde 1 Superscoreboard (@ClydeSSB) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,811 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Clyde 1 Superscoreboard sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ClydeSSB have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ClydeSSB post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going