Back to @Cloudflare's profile

Cloudflare engagement report

@Cloudflare - 317K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 317K followers
Per impression
0.49%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
4.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
66
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cloudflareconnect, #betterinternet.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #cloudflareconnect, #betterinternet.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cloudflare's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Cloudflare sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,632 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,982 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link88% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202616x their median

    1.1.1.1 now validates DNSSEC signatures using NIST’s post-quantum ML-DSA-44 algorithm. Here is how we manage 2,420-byte signatures and downgrade risks at scale. https://t.co/aITk5t7aVD

    895133341155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    Workers now enables Node.js compatibility by default, supports applications up to 64 mebibytes, and adds a URL-based module registry with import.meta, lazy compilation, shared code caches, and clearer errors. https://t.co/eZxSlcNnLQ

    679902720110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202612x their median

    We redesigned the Cloudflare Blog — dark mode, cleaner UI, faster load times. What you might not know: the whole thing runs on EmDash, a new CMS built on Cloudflare Workers. We were Customer Zero. https://t.co/XDj4qj4XUC

    666593327176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202610x their median

    Yesterday's solar eclipse didn't just block the sun — it put a dent in Internet traffic. In Iceland, Spain, and Portugal, HTTP requests dropped up to 30% right at peak totality. Not a network issue. Just millions of people stepping outside to look up. https://t.co/cAtMEYevEC

    56465201641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20268.9x their median

    Introducing Cloudflare Access for Workers. Attach an Access policy directly to a Worker, and it applies everywhere that Worker runs — routes, custom domains, workers[.]dev and previews — automatically. https://t.co/vN4qB0kziv

    49361151645K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20268.8x their median

    Cloudflare Radar Researcher is a new AI-powered tool that lets you explore global Internet trends and traffic data using plain language. Built entirely on Cloudflare's Developer Platform, it turns natural language queries into real, interactive charts. https://t.co/Q94nNgm5gS

    48250371151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.4x their median

    Your scanner just flagged 4,000 vulnerabilities. 78 are critical. Which one do you fix first? We built a service that answers that question using production evidence. Early access starts today. (1/6) https://t.co/TkfTWPq5Lk

    420401912122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.8x their median

    If you're building an MCP server, you know the problem: agents need broad permissions in theory, but users don't want to grant all of them. Cloudflare OAuth now supports optional scopes. Users pick what they're comfortable with at consent time — your app gets exactly what was approved. https://t.co/IlQlJxC2kw

    3943712945K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.2x their median

    We found a working remote Spectre attack against Cloudflare Workers. We already fixed it. No exploitation in the wild. Blog post and paper out now: https://t.co/okdulUT1yB

    3524211781K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.9x their median

    AI agents don't just reason anymore. They transact. Cloudflare's Monetization Gateway lets content owners, API providers, and MCP servers charge agents directly, per request, using x402. And today, enterprises building agents with @AWScloud AgentCore Payments can tap into that supply from day one. https://t.co/88cQppzH2o

    2374630925K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cloudflareconnect#betterinternet

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cloudflareconnect, #betterinternet.

What is Cloudflare's engagement rate on X?
Cloudflare (@Cloudflare) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,290 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Cloudflare sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cloudflare have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cloudflare post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going