Back to @ClemsonFB's profile

Clemson Football engagement report

@ClemsonFB - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
0.962%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
2.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
276
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.962% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Clemson Football's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Clemson Football sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20267.1x their median

    RB Adam Randall shows off his stiff arm!! 😳 Tune in on @wbaltv11. https://t.co/1Caa3k1pqS

    1.8K1492726276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.2x their median

    We've waited a long time to say this... It's game week‼️ https://t.co/ue8T7HlZaN

    979156231138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.4x their median

    Team picture day 📸 https://t.co/hKu32pWnaG

    85275111169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.6x their median

    Almost there ⏰ https://t.co/54q4E8hCpd

    627696531K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.6x their median

    The moment @maxwilson_4 told his parents he's on scholarship 🥹🧡 https://t.co/ZjOhZCO1y8

    639421013300K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.5x their median

    Next time we do this, it’ll be game day https://t.co/J6nZvxlpum

    633554334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.5x their median

    The wait is almost over https://t.co/QzffQCTb44

    629537330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.4x their median

    Bryant Wesco went and got it 😮‍💨 https://t.co/JxAgbRHVWs

    6103710543K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.1x their median

    .@DavidsonGideon for 6️⃣💨 https://t.co/qMgjbEqCzV

    553279436K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    .@Bryantwesco19 hit pause 😮‍💨 https://t.co/5utoau7cCz

    521302230K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.962% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

What is Clemson Football's engagement rate on X?
Clemson Football (@ClemsonFB) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,023,580 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Clemson Football sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ClemsonFB have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ClemsonFB post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going