Back to @ClaudiaFijal's profile

Claudia Fijal engagement report

@ClaudiaFijal - 768K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.367%
of 768K followers
Per impression
5.14%
55K views on a typical post
Reach
7.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.48%
263 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 768K followers, an engagement rate of 0.367%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 5.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Claudia Fijal's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.367%, Claudia Fijal sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 20, 202314x their median

    hi from your favorite peach 🥰 https://t.co/0MOs6ULyY1

    35K2.7K2.8K726.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.2x their median

    It’s hot…. 🥵 https://t.co/LhqPwhfszG

    11K3601625320K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20264.0x their median

    1 or 2? 🦋💛 https://t.co/CLuEMQyaYa

    10K5093048224K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20263.7x their median

    Good morning 😃 https://t.co/rYXB5GZRcl

    9.6K2274483249K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20263.2x their median

    💜 https://t.co/jUYp0nFAN1

    8.3K3533397111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.0x their median

    Rawr 🐯 https://t.co/QpFAAyOStp

    7.6K349349583K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.9x their median

    Soaking up the sun any chance I get ☀️ https://t.co/1hrMckHpt7

    7.6K3341673195K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.0x their median

    Come spend the night 🩷 https://t.co/tVSj8fAo31

    5.1K228234086K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20261.7x their median

    Should I post more on here? 🩷 https://t.co/T7Y5Xleew8

    4.3K194225463K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.7x their median

    Talking to you here - https://t.co/zHkRoJ5QRD https://t.co/syeGjn6RLP

    4.4K194112089K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 768K followers, an engagement rate of 0.367%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 5.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Claudia Fijal's engagement rate on X?
Claudia Fijal (@ClaudiaFijal) has an engagement rate of 0.367%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 767,836 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.367%, Claudia Fijal sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ClaudiaFijal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ClaudiaFijal post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going