Back to @Citationsgarces's profile

Citations de garces engagement report

@Citationsgarces - 434K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.42%
of 434K followers
Per impression
1.08%
575K views on a typical post
Reach
132.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.082%
473 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6.2K interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 1.42%. Posts are seen about 575K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 132.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 1.8x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #macron.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.42%, Citations de garces sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 602 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20261.8x their median

    🔴🇫🇷 𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 — Le Point révèle que les enquêtes visant Guillaume Pley sont arrivées quelques mois après l’échec d’une tentative de prise de contrôle de Legend par Mediawan. Un timing qui interroge les dirigeants du média. En 2025, Mediawan avait proposé 2 millions d’euros pour acquérir 51 % de Legend, valorisant le média à seulement 4 millions d'euros. Une offre jugée « ridicule » et refusée par ses actionnaires. Un an plus tard, Legend est valorisé à près de 70 MILLIONS D’EUROS après l’entrée du fonds belge FG Bros à son capital. Les dirigeants de Legend soulignent également que plusieurs propriétaires ou actionnaires des médias concernés par les enquêtes sont liés à Mediawan : Matthieu Pigasse, Pierre-Antoine Capton et Xavier Niel. « Si ce n’est pas une opération de représailles, ça y ressemble quand même un peu, non ? », estime un cadre de Legend auprès du Point. (Source : Le Point)

    9.2K1.8K220941.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    🚨 Reddit users say OpenAI may have cut Codex limits in half NerfTrack estimates the weekly ChatGPT Plus limit dropped from roughly $160 in API value to about $80 within a few days. Users on the $100 Pro 5x and $200 Pro 20x plans are also reporting their weekly quota now disappears in 1 to 3 days. https://t.co/30SnbKYxcE

    2.4K170220124473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    After being a loyal Codex customer, I am now looking for alternatives. Codex team and the OpenAI leadership decided to change the usage limits on Pro customers , and in parallel giving up to 70% cheaper inference via 3rd party vendors for API usage which is not also cheaper but FASTER too. Codex will be the plan B or C for now on.

    1.0K36581263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Pour être « branchée », suffirait-il donc de haïr Israël ? Bastos remet à leur place ces influenceuses pro-palestiniennes qui pleurnichent à longueur de journée sur leur prétendue perte d’abonnés depuis qu’elles ont choisi d’afficher leur soutien à la cause palestinienne. 😉 https://t.co/kOlzXu0Bk5

    860191288137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    JUST IN🚨- Codex users are reporting 50-77% drops in their estimated weekly usage.

    99540421041K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2025

    La récré est finie 😁 Sébastien Delogu : “Je ne serai plus député, je retourne au quartier… Ils vont me faire la misère…” 🤣 https://t.co/KACIEeHOZU

    5951289212145K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 2024

    https://t.co/JG8qiLJ4cI

    2024218839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    openai would lose way more users than anthropic if tibo stops giving resets.

    224537222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    I love Codex so much

    20013.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    https://t.co/KjRqUFzzHq

    00001.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#macron

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.2K interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 1.42%. Posts are seen about 575K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 132.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 1.8x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Citations de garces's engagement rate on X?
Citations de garces (@Citationsgarces) has an engagement rate of 1.42%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 434,290 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.42%, Citations de garces sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Citationsgarces have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Citationsgarces post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going