Cisco Security engagement report
@CiscoSecure - 363K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bhusa, #awssummit, #agenticera.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #bhusa, #awssummit, #agenticera.
Compared with accounts its own size
Cisco Security's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Cisco Security sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 59% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 262 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 23, 20262.6x their median
Black Hat USA is coming. Here's what Cisco Security's sessions will explore: -Security at Agentic Scale: Protecting the Enterprise in the Age of AI Agents -When AI Finds Vulnerabilities Faster Than Humans Can Patch Check out our full itinerary in the carousel! #BHUSA https://t.co/YV4ABvhGad
- Aug 25, 20262.6x their median
Infrastructure is becoming the system of action for AI. Identity must become its foundation of trust. Read more: https://t.co/XcoOwfuZeT https://t.co/kK63bddEUU
- Aug 5, 20262.1x their median
Every security gap starts somewhere: an unmonitored agent, an unpatched system, an unverified identity, an undetected anomaly. Check out our in-booth theater sessions: 4 sessions, each under 20 minutes, closing the gaps that matter most. See you there! #BHUSA https://t.co/apznfRonTb
- Aug 12, 20262.0x their median
For 11 years, Cisco has done something most security vendors never get to do: protect a network built by design to be attacked. As the Official Security Cloud Provider, Cisco helps stand up a fully operational SOC inside the Black Hat's NOC in just 5 days. https://t.co/mlPEWKTgdU
- Aug 6, 20261.8x their median
One dashboard, every domain. Watch Ant Ducker at Black Hat to see how Cisco Cloud Control integrates our entire technology stack and brings agentic capabilities to the forefront. https://t.co/x9pFUUzjUD
- Aug 17, 20261.6x their median
Securing AI agents isn't a bigger version of securing devices. It's a different problem entirely. Without shared context across identity, access, and segmentation, gaps emerge. Cisco's approach? Know every agent. Authorize every action. Adapt in real time: https://t.co/W7hGAlm4vy https://t.co/49X2DBDSzU
- Aug 26, 2026
Shadow AI thrives when security creates friction. Cisco IT closed that gap with an internal AI assistant for every employee, secure by design. -90% adoption -6 hrs saved weekly per engineer -Costs less than most off-the-shelf tools https://t.co/cBixP2P8l5 https://t.co/JOcPqGlLDm
- Aug 27, 2026
Firewalls were built for a world with clear edges. Hybrid environments don't work that way. Cisco's Hybrid Mesh Firewall fuses security into the network fabric: adaptive segmentation, zero-day protection, and unified management. https://t.co/nhShSwEZTq https://t.co/L5fZ9JVLQg
- Aug 17, 2026
89% of organisations are already using AI to better understand threats, and 85% are using it for detection. The organizations getting the most from agentic AI are the ones pairing that momentum with clear governance from the start. Link below 👇 https://t.co/BI0Av7f0jb
- Jul 15, 2026
Beyond the hype. Into the reality of AI-driven threats. We're heading to Black Hat to explore how defenders can move past uncertainty, noise, and incomplete signals toward clearer, evidence-based security decisions. Join us on the Main Stage in Las Vegas. #BHUSA https://t.co/ChXigZp27O
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bhusa, #awssummit, #agenticera.
- What is Cisco Security's engagement rate on X?
- Cisco Security (@CiscoSecure) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 362,539 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Cisco Security sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @CiscoSecure have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @CiscoSecure post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.