Back to @CindyCh57883601's profile

CindySnow engagement report

@CindyCh57883601 - 257K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.129%
of 257K followers
Per impression
2.68%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
334
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 257K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CindySnow's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.129%, CindySnow sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 103 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 20268.6x their median

    週末上個小禮物😂😅大家週要開心喔🥰😊 喜歡這部嗎?留言告訴我!(好youtuber梗)😅😅😅 https://t.co/myZFfX9lVm

    2.7K10186033K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20267.0x their median

    這套真的拍起來近期最滿意 影片也是😅🤣 是不是今天晚再來二次試拍😅😳 https://t.co/B3wSxFbSjX

    2.3K3358027K viewsView on X
  • May 19, 20263.4x their median

    最近很懶的發文 一方面前陣子推特演算法真的很怪 一篇文章或投票才幾百人看 是發生什麼事🥺 這樣就會懶的發文修圖 乾脆自己看就好啦😂 不過偶爾還是更新一下好了 來發個久違的小短片😂🤣 大家訂閱愛心訂起來(誤)😅 突然發現今天是520 大家520快樂! https://t.co/GhVFazAs06

    2.0K6553038K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.5x their median

    這件真的不錯😅🤣🥰 考慮要來入手同款紅色或白色 大家喜歡嗎🥰🤣😳😂 https://t.co/iBd9KwLIGP

    1.8K2935025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20255.0x their median

    https://t.co/VoxKiYVyqV 小剪一段 就當作之前說好的27萬感謝祭囉😅😂 因為想玩慢速鏡頭就把聲音調靜音了😅🤣 原聲無慢速全長影片就等緣份囉😳🤣😅 大家喜歡這版本慢速鏡頭嗎?留言告訴我 順便記得開啟小鈴噹 (不對)🤣🤣🤣 反正就是歡迎留言或私訊感想心得啦🤎

    1.5K431021285K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20262.7x their median

    叫到有點燒聲😅😂 最喜歡看對方眼神變野獸特別大力衝刺的表情 只是我也就會叫的很累🤣🤣😂 https://t.co/kDfwVOhZgW

    1.6K2842030K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20264.8x their median

    今天股票又要大跌了嗚😭😭😭 只好繼續經營付費OF平台回血了😭(誤) 美股再跌要去住公園啦🤣😂😅😭趁還有摩鐵可以住多拍幾部影片好了😂😅😅 https://t.co/Hs8Iz8Dmsm

    1.6K2132029K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20264.6x their median

    跟同事下班去討論一下工作進度結果發現小外套下穿的是有點小性感風時 會....😅😂🤣 https://t.co/RSlnhRUVsC

    1.5K2327024K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.5x their median

    週間 去摩鐵進行業務討論🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/qTo5jKApc3

    1.4K1633026K viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 20254.4x their median

    今天莫名想....😳😳😳 是排卵期嗎? 莫名燥熱想要被 >< 決定不穿一般內衣, 就穿鏤空的黑色胸衣+胸貼, 加一件雪紡上衣 (淺粉紅, 搭黑色短裙加透膚絲) 當作今天OOTD 😅😅😅 今天捷運跟公司同事看到算賺到😳😳😳 鏤空胸衣奶奶會一直晃也不管了~ 走路小心一點就好 😂😅

    1.4K9970179K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 257K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

What is CindySnow's engagement rate on X?
CindySnow (@CindyCh57883601) has an engagement rate of 0.129%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 256,998 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.129%, CindySnow sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CindyCh57883601 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CindyCh57883601 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going