Back to @ChuckCallesto's profile

Chuck Callesto engagement report

@ChuckCallesto - 924K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 924K followers
Per impression
0.67%
51K views on a typical post
Reach
5.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
342
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 342 interactions against 924K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 254x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #giuliogolia, #leiene, #nyc.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #giuliogolia, #leiene, #nyc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chuck Callesto's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, Chuck Callesto sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 368 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 21, 2026254x their median

    “Because you never know when the last one is” - Kyle Busch, last week Wow https://t.co/vIkBsD9zL3

    75K9.8K6871.2K11M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202688x their median

    .@marcorubio realizing that he’s about to be drafted for the @WNBA: https://t.co/yDz9VlyIbz

    27K2.9K406261447K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202662x their median

    I can't stop laughing...😂 https://t.co/szBrEW1Jx3

    18K2.5K1561851.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 12, 202562x their median

    From the bottom of my heart, I’m asking for prayers for my mom once again. She’s enduring unimaginable pain from multiple rib fractures, a broken nose, a forehead laceration, and a bed sore—all injuries that could have been avoided. Please pray for her swift healing and for me to find adequate care for her advanced dementia. It feels like such a basic need, yet it’s heartbreaking how hard it is to achieve right now. The care at rehab facilities and nursing homes in Florida are appalling. Massive corporate companies prioritize profits over care, protected by armies of attorneys who shield them from accountability. Decisions are made in boardrooms with no regard for the residents’ well-being and that indifference trickles down to create a culture where neglect is the norm. My mom has suffered multiple serious falls, and the last one—resulting in these devastating injuries—was completely avoidable. If the staff were properly trained and took even basic precautions, this wouldn’t have happened. It’s all on video, but so far, the facility is refusing to provide or show me the complete, original footage. Instead, they only shared an edited, slow-motion version that was bad enough. This lack of transparency raises even more questions, and I can’t help but wonder how much of this could have been prevented if they had done their job. I visit my mom every day—after work, on my lunch break when I can, and sometimes in the morning for surprise visits. Despite this, I often find her alone, disoriented, and seeking reassurance. Staff walk past her without a word. She’s frequently left soiled, and I’m the one cleaning her, taking her to the bathroom, and doing the things they’re supposed to do. Instead of spending quality time with her, giving her the love and comfort she deserves, I’m filling in for their lack of care. Because she has dementia, she doesn’t understand what’s happening and forgets everything, making her even more vulnerable. I can’t help but think of the other residents, those whose families can’t or don’t visit daily. What happens to them? Residents, especially those with dementia, are treated like second-class citizens. This is their home, yet they’re denied safety, dignity, and respect. While I’m grateful for the rare nurses and caregivers who genuinely care, the majority are indifferent. Some hide in the back of empty resident room doors or sit on their phones while alarms blare at every nurse’s station. I know because I’m there every day, and I see it. Florida’s minimal staffing guidelines and lack of oversight have enabled this crisis. I’m calling on @vanessa4florida, @SenMarcoRubio, @RepGregSteube, @GovRonDeSantis and @RickScott to address this disgraceful situation. Our vulnerable seniors deserve better. The lack of compassion, care, and accountability in these facilities is unacceptable, and it has to change. I’m overwhelmed and desperate for help. Please pray for my mom, and for every resident enduring this systemic neglect. I also pray that those in power finally step up to ensure all seniors are treated with the care, respect, and dignity they deserve. Thank you for listening.

    12K2.4K3.6K268401K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202646x their median

    BREAKING: Fake Trump Impeachment Whistleblower Alex Vindman was just defeated in his primary for U.S. Senate in Florida despite spending 16x his opponent. https://t.co/OTrJQ8W2Do

    13K1.7K797290458K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202646x their median

    He didn’t just save lives the other day in Idaho. He will save lives for years to come. Right now, countless would-be mass shooters are seeing this image and having second thoughts. The uncertainty of who is carrying and who is trained is a deterrent. Guns save lives. https://t.co/WsPOvNZ5W3

    12K2.8K36577110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202633x their median

    RFK's speech in Dallas one of the greatest speeches I have seen in my over 50 years in American politics

    9.7K1.1K32135119K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202625x their median

    Homosexual Texas Mayor's HUSBAND arrested for being in the country illegally. THESE HEADLINES WRITE THEMSELVES..

    7.6K93114179K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202622x their median

    Really?! 🤦‍♀️ https://t.co/vBo6NIMyGa

    6.1K511664146421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202618x their median

    BREAKING: 🚨 Indiana's Lt. Governor Micah Beckwith joins multiple calls to FIRE Indiana Fever head coach Stephanie White, following her REFUSAL to protect, stand-up or defend members of her squad. https://t.co/UHl2T8tP6d

    5.3K7116314255K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#giuliogolia#leiene#nyc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 342 interactions against 924K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 254x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #giuliogolia, #leiene, #nyc.

What is Chuck Callesto's engagement rate on X?
Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 923,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, Chuck Callesto sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChuckCallesto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChuckCallesto post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going