Back to @Christyzer's profile

CHRISTYZER engagement report

@Christyzer - 97K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.386%
of 97K followers
Per impression
7.53%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
5.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
376
interactions (median)
Saved
0.261%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 376 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.386%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 7.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #christy, #fabulaquadrantis, #whateverwillbe.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #christy, #fabulaquadrantis, #whateverwillbe.

Compared with accounts its own size

CHRISTYZER's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.386%, CHRISTYZER sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 20268.3x their median

    MAHADAHSYAT ANGELINA CHRISTY🫠🤍 🔗Angelina Christy Instagram Post https://t.co/aXfYmrJOzf

    2.6K4584730K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.5x their median

    Angelina Christy on JKT48 Digital Photobook "Cheerful Little Wishes" https://t.co/5R8pxznuH7

    1.3K33751013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.1x their median

    Angelina Christy on JKT48 Digital Photobook "Theater Sementara 2026" https://t.co/EEDcmjJaFK

    1.3K2591118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.9x their median

    CANTIKK BANGETTT😖🫠💗💗 @A_ChristyJKT48 🔗Angelina Christy Tiktok Story https://t.co/nuxWTxZnXW

    1.3K2230013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.5x their median

    ehh cakeupp amayyy~ yukk bisaa yukk panjangin lagi rambutnya😻☝🏻 🔗Angelina Christy Tiktok https://t.co/zppSMDuAK8

    1.1K2175013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.7x their median

    CEWEE CAKEPP🤩🫰🏻 @A_ChristyJKT48 🔗Angelina Christy Instagram Story https://t.co/76Toxj2E0d

    8241771215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.6x their median

    Cakeuppp🤏🏻 @A_ChristyJKT48 🔗Angelina Christy Instagram Story https://t.co/rmAm7vNoVT

    849135108.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.5x their median

    thankyouu live nyaa! cakep amayy😻🫰🏻 semangatt kegiatan hari ini yaa💗 @A_ChristyJKT48 https://t.co/ih4LMaB63R

    817126018.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.5x their median

    BISA YANG BENER DIKIT GA KALIAN😭🫵🏻 @A_ChristyJKT48 @I_KathrinaJKT48 🔗Angelina Christy Tiktok https://t.co/4RjAVuQty8

    7731510311K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.2x their median

    CEWEE IMUPPP😽🤏🏻 @A_ChristyJKT48 🔗Angelina Christy Instagram Story https://t.co/hh4KPg0u4Y

    698117008.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#christy#fabulaquadrantis#whateverwillbe#クリスティ#alyafinalascent

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 376 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.386%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 7.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #christy, #fabulaquadrantis, #whateverwillbe.

What is CHRISTYZER's engagement rate on X?
CHRISTYZER (@Christyzer) has an engagement rate of 0.386%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 97,124 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.386%, CHRISTYZER sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Christyzer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Christyzer post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going