Back to @ChristopherJM's profile

Christopher Miller engagement report

@ChristopherJM - 388K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.051%
of 388K followers
Per impression
1.07%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
196
interactions (median)
Saved
0.071%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.2/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ukraine, #germany, #russia.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #ukraine, #germany, #russia.

Compared with accounts its own size

Christopher Miller's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.051%, Christopher Miller sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video18% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 337 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202612x their median

    Kicked off an international working trip with our team, focused on advancing our new initiatives in digitalization and defense tech. First stop — a meeting with Italian Minister of Defense @GuidoCrosetto. I expressed my gratitude to Guido for his personal support and for the offer to serve as his Advisor on Defense Innovations. I am deeply thankful for this trust and strategic partnership. In this role, I will assist Italy in adopting modern warfare technologies, enhancing its defense sector, and adapting to emerging global security challenges. Ukraine and our team possess unique, real-world experience in high-tech warfare that we are eager to share with our allies. At the same time, my primary focus remains unchanged: I continue my work in Ukraine on core projects that strengthen our defense and help attract international resources. During our meeting, we discussed drones, autonomous systems, air defense, and building out the defense tech ecosystem. The future of defense belongs to nations that can rapidly test and scale new solutions by pairing cutting-edge technology with robust manufacturing. Ukraine’s experience can serve as the foundation for Europe’s new defense model. Our international trip continues. Ahead are key meetings with partners regarding digitalization, defense tech, and launching new collaborative projects.

    1.5K207461119416K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202310.0x their median

    It’s here! U.S. publication day for THE WAR CAME TO US: LIFE AND DEATH IN UKRAINE! Huge gratitude to @BloomsburyBooks @BloomsburyPub for believing in it from the start, and to the many Ukrainians who shared their stories over the years. Get your copy in bookstores across America! https://t.co/1RTTpPwsID

    1.5K37884391.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20269.4x their median

    Operation "Crimean Switch Off": +27⚡️ energy hubs across Crimea and the temporarily occupied southern territories were successfully struck by the USF Birds between August 17 and 22. A total of 267 energy hubs have been disabled since the start of the USF operation (July 1–August 22). • Status of Operation "Molochka" ⚓️: Blocking all movement of russia's shadow fleet rust buckets in the Sea of Azov, through the Kerch Strait, and restricting traffic in the northern and northeastern parts of the Black Sea. During August, the USF Birds struck 36 shadow fleet vessels (242 vessels since the operation began on July 6 through August 22: 134🚢 in the Sea of Azov and 108🚢 in the Black Sea).

    1.5K297261157K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.3x their median

    Russia attacked the headquarters of the Ukrainian TV channel We Are Ukraine in Kyiv. A drone smashed into the newsroom during a live broadcast, wounding at least five journalists. Meanwhile, Russia’s drone attacks on Kyiv continue. https://t.co/8POvgmvy4I

    970426112936K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.6x their median

    Vernadsky National Library in Kyiv https://t.co/zAiBM2xM8k

    1.2K896443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.9x their median

    Britain will become the first foreign country to gain access to a vast trove of Ukrainian battlefield data used to train AI models to identify and strike Russian targets under a broad technology-sharing partnership. @charles_clover @GeorgeWParker @fabrice_deprez https://t.co/Sgu4481rQU

    8752341823127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.6x their median

    How the @nytimes and @washingtonpost describe the message CIA Director Ratcliffe conveyed to Russian officials during his trip to Moscow. "John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, made a secretive visit to Moscow this week to privately share his bleak assessment of the state of the Russian war against Ukraine, and to urge the Russians to cut a deal before their military and economic situation gets worse, current and former officials said." "CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s mysterious trip to Moscow this week was preceded by fresh U.S. intelligence indicating that the Kremlin sees the United States as weakened by the Iran war, offering Russia an opportunity to escalate action against American interests and allies in Europe, according to two people familiar with the matter... Ratcliffe’s trip to Moscow was 'less about Putin being in a corner' because his army has failed to break a stalemate on the Ukraine battlefield 'and more because Russia assesses we are depleted and can’t intervene,' one of the people familiar said." https://t.co/M672s4naKg https://t.co/REcVXV7plg

    8481825320289K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.9x their median

    Latest on Ukraine talks: People familiar with the talks in Kyiv tell @FT Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner brought updated versions of earlier documents, revised to reflect the changed circumstances since peace negotiations stalled in February, at the outset of the US war with Iran. But the Trump envoys came with few new ideas, the people said, and were instead seeking to revive earlier proposals and to narrow differences between Kyiv and Moscow. A central issue is the remaining Ukrainian-held territory in the Donbas, which Russia has claimed as its own but has failed to capture despite years of fighting. The eastern region, some 75% of which is under Russian control, is a red line for Zelenskyy, who has insisted that Ukraine would never hand over that territory or any other territory that Moscow’s forces occupy. https://t.co/bt7U8XHNHF

    5331823326136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.5x their median

    NEW: I went to Washington to interview Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine's ex-defense minister. He's seeking US investment for a defence tech fund he hopes will write a "new history" of the war against Russia by building and managing companies to develop new arms. https://t.co/DANKCRfSVB

    5001233421165K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.7x their median

    Belgium's foreign ministry has warned internally that the US under Donald Trump is no longer a reliable ally and urged officials to cultivate ties with his opponents to protect the country's interests, according to a document seen by @FT's @lauramdubois. https://t.co/lLi7mN6VZd

    334167121016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ukraine#germany#russia

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ukraine, #germany, #russia.

What is Christopher Miller's engagement rate on X?
Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.051%, Christopher Miller sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChristopherJM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChristopherJM post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going