Back to @ChristineCaine's profile

Christine Caine engagement report

@ChristineCaine - 439K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 439K followers
Per impression
1.77%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
87
interactions (median)
Saved
0.071%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 87 interactions against 439K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Christine Caine's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, Christine Caine sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 271 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 202617x their median

    I AM 60!!!!! I have never been more grateful, more fired up, or more certain of what I was made for. Looking back at these moments, the places, the faces, I am overwhelmed by what God has done and undone and rebuilt. None of it was what I planned. All of it was better. πŸ’› https://t.co/sJuJUlODMI

    1.3K42124715K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20267.2x their median

    Do not lose your peace over something you can do nothing about. Take everything to God, because He is the only One who can do something about everything. Put it down. Hand it over. Trust Him with it. πŸ’› https://t.co/9TwoYLAmz5

    519959211K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20266.2x their median

    Nothing will test your faith like nothing. Not opposition. Not hardship. The silence. Elijah heard the sound of rain before a single drop fell. That gap between the promise and the downpour? That is the faith zone. Keep praying. Keep believing. Go again. 🎧 https://t.co/lcgY9ysDhe

    4486815716K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.9x their median

    You have authority over your own heart. Don't give it permission to spiral over something you can't control. If the enemy takes your peace, he gets your heart. Take it to God. He's the only one who can do something about everything. 🎧New podcast β†’ https://t.co/1f5CdR7H3d https://t.co/6TdkR5HPvH

    271471647.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.4x their median

    Before Jericho fell, God gave Israel a battle plan that made no sense. The laps didn't shrink the walls β€” they built the faith that brought them down. With whatever wall you’re facing, you don't need a better strategy. Take one more lap of obedience. Keep walking. πŸ’› https://t.co/Opn82H3N2r

    240351077.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.6x their median

    Everything you look back on and wish had gone differently β€” God was using it to form you. You can't skip the pain and still get the formation. He was in every hard season. And He is in this one, too. Trust Him with it. πŸ’› https://t.co/pxjqwIUVdx

    18630829.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.4x their median

    Joseph didn't arrive at the palace in spite of the pit and the prison. He arrived ready for it because of them. For more messages like this, head to my YouTube channel. 🀍 https://t.co/xA4bAALVyS

    17622918.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    Sometimes the most spiritual thing you can do is eat something and go back to sleep, when what your soul actually needs is what God prescribed for Elijah at his lowest point in 1 Kings 19: bread, sleep, and the gentlest voice saying get up and eat. πŸ’› https://t.co/SNPYGAAwdi

    17024525.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.3x their median

    Peace is not the absence of chaos. It is what happens when you take everything to God and actually leave it there. Take it to Him. Leave it there. Go again. 🎧 Head to https://t.co/1f5CdR7H3d to discover more from the Equip & Empower podcast! https://t.co/zqCSabXBQy

    17423304.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.2x their median

    Jesus didn't say, "I am finished." He said, "It is finished." Not defeat. Declaration. His last breath became our first. Where He died, we came to life. You do not have to earn what He already accomplished. NEW SERIES 🎧 Head to https://t.co/uyqXZDuZhA to listen! https://t.co/frgBHmRrQz

    15628705.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 87 interactions against 439K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Christine Caine's engagement rate on X?
Christine Caine (@ChristineCaine) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 438,752 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, Christine Caine sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChristineCaine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChristineCaine post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going