Back to @Chris_L_Wells's profile

Chris Wells engagement report

@Chris_L_Wells - 57K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.001%
of 57K followers
Per impression
0.266%
188 views on a typical post
Reach
0.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 188 times each, and 0.266% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.329% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Chris Wells sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 40 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 2026

    Me with Hugo! https://t.co/OAbeqSWw4u

    13100723 viewsView on X
  • May 17, 2026

    2026 JH2 visualization made by Grok. https://t.co/zYwcKDOYaV

    13000479 viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 2026

    AGE OF REDEMPTION “Anomaly” T=11-16 https://t.co/E16W1PayOg via @YouTube

    11000414 viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 2026

    SIA - Alive ( Age of Redemption Remix by Chris Wells ) https://t.co/RNa5Tw4OXu via @YouTube

    10000541 viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026

    Me with Kaylan! https://t.co/nvPAYTxTFD

    9000378 viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 2026

    AGE OF REDEMPTION ACT 13 — Scene X “Refusal” https://t.co/qrfjRpYXkn via @YouTube

    8000350 viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 2026

    AGE OF REDEMPTION ACT 13 — Scene VIII “Override” https://t.co/mQuYeEKDzy via @YouTube

    7000215 viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    Most probable root cause of Starship powered-flight failures (ascent through landing burns): Raptor + propellant feed/plumbing reliability under real flight dynamics. Key patterns: • Flight harmonics far stronger than ground tests → feed-line stress, methane leaks into attic → fires & sequential engine-outs • Turbopump/ignition & multi-engine relight issues (boostback + landing burns) • Occasional direct engine hardware failures allowing propellant mixing Primary stainless monocoque structure & thrust loads have held up well. TPS is secondary (reuse, not most RUDs). Flight 13 Ship progress is clear. Keep iterating the engines & feed systems — that’s the critical path. Data synthesized from public flight reports & post-flight analyses through Flight 13. @elonmusk @SpaceX

    6000366 viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 2026

    This one or the other one? https://t.co/nlXu4TQxgY

    6000285 viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 2026

    Outdoor filmmaker with camera gear https://t.co/ntUIXCWW3R

    5000395 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 188 times each, and 0.266% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.329% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chris Wells's engagement rate on X?
Chris Wells (@Chris_L_Wells) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 57,162 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Chris Wells sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chris_L_Wells have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Chris_L_Wells post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going