Back to @Chris_Broussard's profile

Chris Broussard engagement report

@Chris_Broussard - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.084%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.952%
119K views on a typical post
Reach
8.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.076%
91 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 119K times each, and 0.952% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chris Broussard's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.084%, Chris Broussard sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202626x their median

    WE ARE BACK!!!! GOOD LUCK!!!! @Chiefs ❤️❤️❤️

    27K2.0K426105679K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202622x their median

    The WNBA, just as it’s beginning to pop, will soon be the G-League unless these women start using common sense. Do what’s right & protect girls & women in sports!

    20K1.7K1.6K8562.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    “This season is Super Bowl or Bust… It’s not about going 17-0… So I’m critical… I did not like it Wildes… I RELISHED IT! GREG, I’M BESIDE MYSELF! I AM WILD WITH JOY! MAN OH MAN A BROTHER IS HAPPY! IN FACT, THE BOX!” @Chris_Brousard is VERY happy with his @Ravens today 📦🤣 https://t.co/yn5GSrevx8

    11K9151372311.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20269.0x their median

    .@kevinwildes: “Micah Parsons trading the pads for the pods.” @Chris_Broussard: “Ha. Ha. Ha.” @getnickwright: 😭😭😭 @GregJennings: “Brou is on one!” https://t.co/tZb8kghxaS

    9.6K484561161.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20267.4x their median

    Ok, can we stop talking about Ben Johnson like he invented the Wing T, the Wishbone, the Forward Pass, the Option, the Shotgun, the West Coast offense, the Pistol, and the Wildcat? Please?

    7.6K44234682320K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20264.7x their median

    .@Chris_Broussard like what he saw from his Ravens? “No, I’m not happy about that… I’M ECSTATIC! OH MY! I’M WALKING ON AIR! I’M ON CLOUD 9! I’M JUMPING FOR JOY!… THE BOX! And a shovel… You need a shovel when you bury things.” 😎📦🪏 https://t.co/KkUfl7A9Ds

    4.7K4895648172K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.4x their median

    “It was perfect, because whose team colors are those robes?… The Ravens marched into their house and said GET BIJAN, DRAKE, MICHAEL PENIX JR, GO GET ME YOUR ROBES! They put ‘em on in their house & kicked their feet up!” @Chris_Broussard reacts to the Ravens OT win vs. Falcons: https://t.co/YulfJylrCm

    3.4K3562613214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.9x their median

    😎 @Chris_Broussard https://t.co/P4BB9nl4Yx

    3.1K1811710151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.8x their median

    Is @Chris_Broussard concerned about his Ravens? “Concerned? Wildes, I am not concerned, I am not worried, nor am I fretful… Imma give them time to clean it up. So no, Wildes, I am not concerned…. Seriously, I’m not concerned. It was a bad game, not a bad sign.” 😅😅 https://t.co/lFW3Uq71dk

    2.9K1525215267K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.3x their median

    “I know yesterday I said Purdy had no chance of outplaying Stafford, but I woke up feeling dangerous.” @Chris_Broussard thinks the 49ers will upset the Rams 🤯 https://t.co/6Q9Iswz7u9

    2.2K9126555481K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 119K times each, and 0.952% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Chris Broussard's engagement rate on X?
Chris Broussard (@Chris_Broussard) has an engagement rate of 0.084%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,344,786 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.084%, Chris Broussard sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chris_Broussard have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chris_Broussard post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going