Chris Williamson engagement report
@ChrisWillx - 611K followers on X
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 510 interactions against 611K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #bbc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Chris Williamson's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.084%, Chris Williamson sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 21% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 386 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 12, 2026107x their median
Am absolutely. Loving my holiday in Spain . Met this young lad very gorgeous but. Unfortunately gay or I’d have. Drained his sack. Anyone want to give me a facial Love Belinda. Xx https://t.co/HFHiVb1Ec1
- Mar 1, 202677x their median
-Study for 20 years -work for 40 years -free for 5-10 years -Die It’s a scam bro https://t.co/REZnsXjJTc
- Aug 23, 202626x their median
multiple straight men in my Pilates class this morning https://t.co/FisH1PhrIj
- Aug 16, 202620x their median
Back when tattoos were rarer, they used to be a thing for guys. Now that tattoos are common, it's actually more common for women to have them. The numbers have gotten so bad that now nearly half of young women have tattoos: https://t.co/OnUd1RP0sy
- Sep 7, 202611x their median
The most common reasons for failing, in order. 1) Never starting. 2) Quitting too soon. 3) Not doing enough volume. 4) Not doing it consistently enough. 5) Doing too many different things. 6) Not shooting big enough. — @AlexHormozi
- Aug 9, 20218.7x their median
I’ve spent 3 months compiling a Reading List of the most interesting & impactful books I’ve ever read. 100 books to read before you die ✅ Fiction, non-fiction & real life stories ✅ Summaries of each book ✅ Get your copy for FREE 🔗 https://t.co/rdGYw7gHdf
- Sep 7, 20268.0x their median
New habit hack; become a dictator. The former dictator of Turkmenistan banned smoking because he wanted to quit himself.
- Aug 14, 20267.6x their median
Study Shows 528 hz music increases testosterone and lowers anxiety. Start frequencymaxxing https://t.co/1BPsS1fxwl
- Aug 20, 20267.0x their median
Game on https://t.co/nnMSTHEq5O
- Oct 9, 20266.2x their median
Reacting to a female tech exec’s dating ‘non-negotiables’ https://t.co/JQ5Nz0FBbI
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 510 interactions against 611K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.
- What is Chris Williamson's engagement rate on X?
- Chris Williamson (@ChrisWillx) has an engagement rate of 0.084%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 611,189 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.084%, Chris Williamson sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ChrisWillx have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ChrisWillx post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.