Back to @ChrisGPackham's profile

Chris Packham engagement report

@ChrisGPackham - 576K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.118%
of 576K followers
Per impression
3.22%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
3.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
682
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 682 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.118%, Chris Packham sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 30, 20268.2x their median

    Remember the old days when we were part of Europe . . . before the Brexit liars won out . . . but then as we queue the economy crumbles as a result too . Lesson - don’t believe their lies ! https://t.co/1ztS4gilmh

    3.0K7811.7K92127K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20263.8x their median

    A fox quadrat ? ! Shared by Karen Chignell on Facebook for your #FoxOfTheDay today https://t.co/1PX8I8CpM2

    2.4K20033527K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20263.6x their median

    One , two , three , four ! A quadruple #FoxOfTheDay today from Shearer Catherine on Facebook . https://t.co/b3qF85JbcY

    2.2K18020521K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20263.4x their median

    Vixen and cub , shared by Gareth Price on Facebook for your #FoxOfTheDay today ! https://t.co/TjWP8IfZYF

    2.1K20619520K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20263.0x their median

    Another #FoxOfTheDay with a penchant for flower pots , shared by Maguerite Dennison on Facebook ! https://t.co/mhaWom2NfU

    1.8K19122117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20262.7x their median

    Good morning , and a garden visitor for @gp-wildlife.bsky.social for today's #FoxOfTheDay ! https://t.co/WmToiJrWHM

    1.7K12117222K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20262.7x their median

    " I have no photographic skills whatsoever, so I realise this is never going to be #FoxOfTheDay " - well here you go @toomuchsinging.bsky.social ! https://t.co/6f8ZzjB4qJ

    1.7K12229021K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.6x their median

    From yesterday outside @Pret in London– no more words, we want action! Get frankenchickens out of your supply chain. https://t.co/hXfq3zHGMo @anima_uk https://t.co/ZMT4Uw57rb

    1.4K33033447K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.4x their median

    " My garden has become a playground for fox cubs " - Brilliant @cancienne.bsky.social , thank you for today's #FoxOfTheDay ! https://t.co/1gZUpJqAFb

    1.5K10322122K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20262.4x their median

    Thank you to Heidi Burton for sharing this young individual , your #FoxOfTheDay for today ! https://t.co/zggRLyREsb

    1.5K11511115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 682 interactions against 576K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chris Packham's engagement rate on X?
Chris Packham (@ChrisGPackham) has an engagement rate of 0.118%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 575,792 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.118%, Chris Packham sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChrisGPackham have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ChrisGPackham post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going