Back to @ChonkyLotus's profile

ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏 engagement report

@ChonkyLotus - 58K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.851%
of 58K followers
Per impression
7.83%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
482
interactions (median)
Saved
0.39%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 482 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.851%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 7.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arg, #chonkylotusart, #giantess.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #arg, #chonkylotusart, #giantess.

Compared with accounts its own size

ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.851%, ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 20268.1x their median

    I am curating my followers and mutuals, please unfollow me if you disagree with either of these. - I support LGBT+ activism and inclusive feminism. - I'm in favor of women having an abortion if they choose to. - I'm against religion being taught in schools. - Very much against AI. We must support people's work. - Everything is political. Specially gaming. - "Being neutral" is for cowards. Pick a side Ed Sheeran.

    3.3K4141702455K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.8x their median

    When I said β€œ6 months” I meant to say that today marks half a year anniversary of being in estrogen. πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ I’m the happiest I’ve ever being. My past self is undone. The darkness that had once shrouded around me has been lifted and my wings have finally spread. To commemorate this day, here are 3 IRL photos of me, do you like my fit? πŸ–€

    2.0K101169138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.5x their median

    Are you Trans and make content? πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ Please reply to this post, I want to follow and support the girlies

    1.6K113426136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.0x their median

    When your giantess dragoncat is a bit too excited to show you her new bikini ✨ https://t.co/HRqgoxJHP0

    1.3K7037016K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.7x their median

    As a trans woman, I've found refuge underground, within subcultures that are welcoming of any LGBT+ form of expression. My place is somewhere deep in a warehouse or a club with hardcore techno booming it's bass through some massive speakers, surrounded by gays, lesbians, trans, etc. dancing and being free of judgement. Religious performative people that willingly choose to degrade, attack and insult the likes of me without a second thought, are exhausting. If heaven is where all of these people are going, I'll happily pass on that and make myself cozy somewhere in hell. Please don't pray for me, the thought of sharing a place with them, it's horrid. Lastly, I feel really happy lately expressing my thoughts and ideas, and as gratitude for enjoying what I share, here are two random photos of your silly potato at a rave club from last night. πŸ–€

    1.2K8060211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.6x their median

    Being Trans, accepting all that comes with it, the good and the bad, while still pushing forward to become happy requires a very strong soul. Being Trans is worth it, but it will not be painless on an emotional level. It's already complex enough to blossom into a new version of yourself, but on top of it there is a society that is cruel and rejoice in our suffering. Being Trans is being selfish, because at some point you have to choose yourself over anyone else. You know well that not transitioning could make some people close to you happy, but it will cost you your own happiness and a choice that you'll regret silently forever while no one notices nor cares to ask as you wither away. Being Trans is being reborn, either in light or darkness, but happier regardless. It is a beautiful spiritual journey tainted by fear. But once you have rose enough away from the ground with your own wings, nothing will feel more right than being yourself.

    1.1K9232210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.4x their median

    Does this bikini fits me well? πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ https://t.co/LChbgK27LC

    1.1K5548010K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.3x their median

    Hi https://t.co/oBRwM9agsV

    971398506.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.2x their median

    Do you think that Trans women can ever truly be happy? 😊

    87532128419K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.9x their median

    My endocrinologist is not in favor of me using progesterone : ( According to him, it does nothing for the transition. So he suggest we wait about 1 year into the HRT for me to consider using it. Do you think it is good to wait 12 months before taking progesterone or there is no reason to wait? πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

    78215110250K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#arg#chonkylotusart#giantess#inktober#jaxtadc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 482 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.851%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 7.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arg, #chonkylotusart, #giantess.

What is ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏's engagement rate on X?
ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏 (@ChonkyLotus) has an engagement rate of 0.851%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 57,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.851%, ChonkyLotus β›§πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ : Bottom Giantess 🜏 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChonkyLotus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChonkyLotus post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going