Chinmayi Sripaada engagement report
@Chinmayi - 975K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 975K followers, an engagement rate of 0.192%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.
Compared with accounts its own size
Chinmayi Sripaada's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.192%, Chinmayi Sripaada sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.047% to 0.325%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.001% |
| 25th percentile | 0.007% |
| 50th percentile | 0.047% |
| 75th percentile | 0.325% |
| 90th percentile | 2.60% |
| 99th percentile | 357.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | 0% | 15K |
| 01:00 UTC | +4% | 15K |
| 02:00 UTC | -1% | 14K |
| 03:00 UTC | -2% | 15K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 05:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 06:00 UTC | -7% | 13K |
| 07:00 UTC | -6% | 14K |
| 08:00 UTC | -7% | 17K |
| 09:00 UTC | -2% | 19K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 20K |
| 11:00 UTC | -2% | 22K |
| 12:00 UTC | -1% | 24K |
| 13:00 UTC | +1% | 27K |
| 14:00 UTC | -2% | 29K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 16:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 17:00 UTC | -1% | 28K |
| 18:00 UTC | +1% | 25K |
| 19:00 UTC | 0% | 24K |
| 20:00 UTC | 0% | 22K |
| 21:00 UTC | +1% | 19K |
| 22:00 UTC | +1% | 17K |
| 23:00 UTC | +1% | 15K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +8% | 59K |
| Monday | +8% | 72K |
| Tuesday | +1% | 94K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 78K |
| Thursday | -3% | 71K |
| Friday | -5% | 73K |
| Saturday | +2% | 64K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 70% of posts | +79% | +73% to +85% | 5.8K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -49% | -50% to -47% | 6.1K |
| Typical length | - | +13% | +10% to +15% | 6.4K |
- 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 496 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 202653x their median
Sinead O’Connor revealed a network of pedophiles and their protectors in 1992. She was a victim herself and to protest ripped up a photo of John Paul II that ended her career. We now have a circulating photo of John Paul II blessing Epstein. She was right all the time. https://t.co/5ZiOfoWcJa
- Aug 17, 202643x their median
‼️ BREAKING: Journalists hid an Airtag in a rare book shipment and confirmed Amazon to be one of the buyers behind the bulk orders destroying rare-books to feed their AI. They tracked it to Amazon's LAS8 warehouse in Las Vegas, home to VGT3 (see logo below), a scanning operation feeding Amazon's AI training data, where workers say they cut the bindings off books to scan them faster. Amazon won't say why the books are destroyed.
- Aug 18, 202629x their median
It has been 200 days since the Epstein files were released with zero prosecutions. As someone works in human rights, I’ve never seen anything like the Epstein files in my 15-year career. There are 3 million files of documented evidence about powerful men and women who Raped Cannibalized Trafficked Filmed Terrorized Tortured Hunted Murdered 13, 14, 15 year children! Remember: this is a minority of the files. This's just what they were willing to release. Not a single arrest or investigation. ZERO have been arrested for raping children. We called on the U.S. Department of Justice to hand over the full Epstein files to the UN Special Rapporteurs and UN independent committees for investigations, as this is an international case of crimes against humanity. But the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN's top human rights official didn't even care to open an investigation or listen to our call for the DOJ, nor utter a single word regarding the largest human trafficking network in modern history. Epstein pedophiles are investigating Epstein files. We wonder why nobody arrested. Jeffery Epstein has every major politicians and billionaires on video doing something terrible to a child or to multiple people. And the media isn't silent about child sex trafficking because of the children. It’s silent because of who the customers are! The Epstein files is never really about just a "list." It is about children raped by powerful men, and a system that let them get away with it. The bottom line here is the world system has become so corrupt that the time has come I think to clean the crap out of the stables and start over. The Epstein files is about protecting children. There's no greater cause. If people can't unite over children being raped and abused there's no hope for humanity. I don't understand how we're not having a global revolution right now.
- Aug 17, 202610x their median
BREAKING🚨: Anti feminism women discover that misogynistic men hate them no matter how much they pander, uphold patriarchy,or cheer for women to lose rights. Pro natalist men are degrading & dismissive about post partum because they hate women & view women as objects not people. https://t.co/OAMK67LzDb
- Aug 18, 20266.3x their median
Biggest scam of last decade Swachh Bharat Mission Govt collected a dedicated cess in the name of cleanliness. A decade later, look at our roads. Garbage everywhere, broken footpaths, overflowing drains and dust all over the place. https://t.co/TOLpUD9oHy
- Aug 17, 20263.9x their median
🚨 Haryana to build India’s tallest tower at 700 m in Gurugram. https://t.co/pbl23brlga
- Aug 17, 20263.4x their median
I said more women have died in childbirth than men have died in wars and the smooth brain males are crashing out in the comments. Simple google could avoid their argument.
- Aug 18, 20263.4x their median
रात 3 बजे तक लाइन में खड़ी रही… मंदिर पहुंची तो बोला – गाजीपुर की ID नहीं चलेगी, बनारस की ID लाओ। जबकि बगल से VIP दर्शन के लिए लोग अंदर जा रहे थे। काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर में दर्शन के लिए गाजीपुर से पहुंची एक लड़की रात करीब 3 बजे तक लाइन में खड़ी रही। जब मंदिर के करीब पहुंची तो पुलिस ने रोका और ID मांगी। उसने अपना आधार कार्ड दिखाया। कहा गया – गाजीपुर की ID नहीं चलेगी, बनारस की ID दिखाओ। लड़की रोने लगी – मैं गाजीपुर की रहने वाली हूं, बनारस की ID कहां से लाऊंगी? लड़की को आगे नहीं जाने दिया गया, जबकि बगल से लोग VIP दर्शन के लिए अंदर जा रहे थे। रोते हुए बोली – क्या मैं अपराधी हूं? जो मैं अंदर जाकर महादेव का मर्डर कर दूंगी.?
- Aug 19, 20263.2x their median
VERY IMPORTANT: Delhi Police has admitted in the SC that facial recognition technology was deployed during the Jantar Mantar protests. Now for facial recognition to make a “match”, there needs to be an underlying database of photos+details of citizens. So where did Delhi Police get that database from? In response to an RTI of mine in 2020, the Election Commission admitted that it had shared the entire voter list WITH PHOTOS with Delhi Police during the Delhi riots investigation. Interestingly, ECI’s own rules PROHIBIT sharing of photo electoral roll with ANY agency. And yet, the ECI broke its own rules in 2020 & handed over the data to Delhi Police. Therefore: 👉 Did ECI supply voter lists with photos to Delhi Police for their facial recognition database during Jantar Mantar protests? 👉 What other agencies (Aadhaar, IT Dept, Transport Dept etc) have shared their database with Delhi Police to be used for facial recognition? 👉 If no agency has provided any data, how is Delhi Police managing to conduct facial recognition on EVERYONE (not just those with a criminal record) during protests? There’s a reason that the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act has NOT yet been fully notified despite being passed by Parliament in Aug 2023 (THREE YEARS AGO). It’s 2 simple questions really: 👉 Will the Delhi Police disclose what database it is using for facial recognition? 👉 Will ECI & other bodies confirm whether they’re still providing photo databases to Delhi Police?
- Aug 18, 20262.5x their median
In 2011, I was sexually abused by my 12-year-old half-brother. During the police investigation, we were told about a ‘previous incident’ involving Charlie. He had sexually abused two kids in 2006. He was seven, and the two kids were seven and three. Children’s Services never told my dad because of ‘Parental Responsibility’ laws. My dad never married Charlie’s mother, so she had automatic responsibility. This law later changed for children born after 2006. We launched a complaint into Norfolk County Council, and the investigation was headed and signed by Paul Corina - a safeguarding manager. I was discussing my story with @RogueUnfiltered last night, and read out the passage where they refused to apologise to me. “I do not believe we can be sure that any action could have been reasonable taken in the knowledge of the incident in 2006 would have prevented the incident of 2011.” Basically, they think I would have been abused anyway. What I ONLY realised last night is that Paul Corina also wrote that if my parents had known, not allowing me and Charlie to be alone together would ‘not have been a proportionate or appropriate response to his behaviour.” I am so angry. Knowing I was sexually abused, knowing it could have been prevented, they decided that protecting me was not worth the inconvenience. My safety didn’t matter enough to tell my father. They looked at the evidence of what Charlie had done, they read that I had suffered at the hands of a known abuser, and still said keeping us apart wouldn’t have been ‘appropriate.’ This is putting countless children at risk. I was at risk. The friends I brought over were at risk. But no measure of safeguarding wasn’t appropriate to them.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 975K followers, an engagement rate of 0.192%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #jaanu, #pranam.
- What is Chinmayi Sripaada's engagement rate on X?
- Chinmayi Sripaada (@Chinmayi) has an engagement rate of 0.192%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 975,472 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.192%, Chinmayi Sripaada sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Chinmayi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Chinmayi post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.