Back to @Chiliz's profile

CHILIZ® engagement report

@Chiliz - 491K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 491K followers
Per impression
0.965%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
2.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
113
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 113 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.965% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 452 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #teamom.

Compared with accounts its own size

CHILIZ®'s engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, CHILIZ® sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 316 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20264.0x their median

    13,459,678 $CHZ BURNED 🔥 As part of our $CHZ buy-back and burn program, The Chiliz Group has burned 13,459,678 $CHZ, representing 10% of proceeds from FAN TOKEN® revenue in July. Estimated value at the time of burn: $182,888. FAN TOKEN® activity → $CHZ buy-back → burn. https://t.co/XkDL4FFpre

    3724628619K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.7x their median

    𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐃: Sports ownership is coming onchain. @Socios and @Securitize are partnering to develop the Socios Equity Token digital assets, regulated tokenized equity offerings involving minority interests in professional sports teams. The initiative will bring together https://t.co/ee4PKrifiF’s global sports network and Securitize’s regulated infrastructure, introducing a new category of ownership to the Chiliz ecosystem and tapping into a global sports industry heading towards a $1 trillion valuation. Read the announcement 👇 https://t.co/BBBqh5moTt

    27281402131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.1x their median

    The biggest evolution of tokenization isn’t simply putting assets people can already access onchain. It’s bringing traditionally hard-to-access markets and ownership opportunities onto new financial rails, like private markets, venture capitals, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, and sports equity. Yesterday, @ARKInvest and @Securitize announced the tokenization of the ARK Venture Fund, a strategy offering exposure to private companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Stripe and Databricks. For Chiliz, the opportunity is sport. Together with @Securitize and @Socios, we’re working to bring regulated minority equity in professional sports teams onchain through the Socios Equity Token.

    3072224316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.0x their median

    Sports ownership is coming onchain. @YahooFinance breaks down how @Socios and @Securitize are working to bring regulated minority equity in professional sports teams onchain through the Socios Equity Token. A new chapter for sports ownership. https://t.co/efV36IODDu

    2962416718K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.9x their median

    CFTC Chairman Michael Selig @ChairmanSelig: “Mass tokenization. 24/7 trading. It’s GO TIME.” At the same time, U.S. Google search interest for “tokenization” has surged to its highest level in this period. Our focus: the tokenization of sports equity. https://t.co/knZTyollLH

    2902014212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.6x their median

    We're partnering with @socios to develop Socios Equity Tokens, regulated tokenized equity offerings involving minority interests in professional sports teams. The partnership will explore new models for capital formation and equity ownership across global sports. https://t.co/sBBLG2pScU

    19845271955K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.5x their median

    Other crypto assets beyond Bitcoin. “Institutions viewed these assets as utility-driven; their value stems from their practical use in the real world.” That line from @Bitwise’s latest report captures where the institutional conversation around crypto is heading. For Chiliz, sport is one of the strongest examples of that opportunity, and together with @Securitize, we’re bringing regulated minority sports equity onchain. https://t.co/kafflCZAk3

    261157012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.1x their median

    Tokenization reaches the mainstream when the buyer no longer needs to be a crypto user. At the @avax Summit, Securitize CEO @carlosdomingo joined @therollupco to explain why demand beyond crypto can take tokenized assets from billions to trillions. https://t.co/UNQwNtIs3L

    1803217954K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.1x their median

    𝟐𝟒,𝟐𝟖𝟕,𝟎𝟒𝟕 $CHZ 𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 Two burns have now been completed, permanently removing approximately $327,673 worth of $CHZ from circulation. Periodic $CHZ burns will continue as part of the ongoing programme and our broader commitment to sustainable tokenomics. 𝟏) 𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 https://t.co/n0F6JEVotU 𝟐) 𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 https://t.co/gLYJCngX8K

    1581948724K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.9x their median

    Introducing Stake to Score. A four-week liquid staking activation where your $CHZ position, liquidity, loyalty, and DeFi activity determine your score. 🏆 350,000 $CHZ in rewards 🎁 30 winners every week 📅 Live until 31 August Here's how it works ⤵️ 🔗 https://t.co/AWRYjAJKT3 https://t.co/2qOht9PA7X

    1265427627K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#teamom

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 113 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.965% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 452 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

What is CHILIZ®'s engagement rate on X?
CHILIZ® (@Chiliz) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 491,392 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, CHILIZ® sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chiliz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chiliz post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going