Back to @Chicago1Ray's profile

@Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ engagement report

@Chicago1Ray - 529K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.36%
of 529K followers
Per impression
13.5%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.11%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 529K followers, an engagement rate of 0.36%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 13.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

@Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.36%, @Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 321 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202628x their median

    Tim Burchett says we need an incapacitation clause to the Constitution McConnell can not be allowed to ride out the rest of his term at home..& vote in absentia McConnell was found unconscious at home, if you're hurt on the job, you get workmans comp.. if you're hurt at home, you're on you're own Time to make Congress live by the rules they write... just like we have to

    40K12K733219301K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202619x their median

    FAFO 🚨 - Tens of thousands of followers lost in (24) hours on Instagram Jelly Roll thought it was a good idea to host Jimmy Kimmel's show and trash the President Jelly Roll is now the human version of Bud Light Hit that like button if you're done with Jelly Roll https://t.co/r0sRGRhoKK

    31K2.8K1.0K155274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202617x their median

    - He wiretapped Trump Tower - Never intended to have a peaceful transfer of power - His regime manufactured the entire Russia Collusion hoax - (26) Trump officials were spied on - Unmasked General Flynn - Tulsi said he doctored Intel Obama said no one's above the law, including Presidents... so what are we waiting on

    22K8.7K1.4K253108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202615x their median

    Inside Job 🚨 Thomas Crooks flew his drone over the Butler County Fairgrounds for (11) minutes, undetected Just so happens the Secret Service anti drone system was down at exactly the same moment Crooks climbed on top of the only bldg that didn't have a surveillance system, it was also the only bldg outside the Secret Service's security perimeter... despite the fact it was very close to the stage, with a clear sight line to Trump BTW Sean Curran was in charge of Trumps security that day.... and now he's running the Secret Service.. and I've lost count on how many attempts there's been on Trumps life Time to get to the very bottom of this https://t.co/vGBTGXNuaw

    21K7.5K454156439K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202615x their median

    Dearborn mayor Abdullah Hammoud turned over Jake Lang's speech to a prosecutor This is what people who believe in Sharia law, want to do with the (1A) rites Raise your hand βœ‹οΈ if you want Trump to sign an Executive Order banning anyone from public office who wasn't born here https://t.co/WTIgqOn73N

    20K6.5K1.3K281164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202614x their median

    Fox News fired Lou Dobbs in (2021) bc he reported on irregularities in Smartmatic voting machines which helped Hugo Chavez win Those machines were made in China Maria Bartiromo was just fired bc Fox doesn't want the truth being told about the 2020 election Fox ain't no different than CNN https://t.co/RAvgAnLlR3

    19K7.6K490223215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202612x their median

    WHO'S WITH ME 🚨 I'm calling on Trump to reinstate his (2017) travel ban from (7) Muslim countries Iran πŸ‘ˆ Iraq πŸ‘ˆ Libya πŸ‘ˆ Somalia πŸ‘ˆ Sudan πŸ‘ˆ Yemen πŸ‘ˆ Let @realDonaldTrump know, he'll see this https://t.co/hnOSE0NCoH

    14K7.3K95628673K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    FAFO 🚨 This is the Karmelo Anthony the media didn't show you.... so this punks atty's want a new trial .....fine Put the death penalty back on the table JUSTICE FOR AUSTIN METCALF https://t.co/JoQDcS5eXe

    16K4.8K29094100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202610x their median

    WATCH 🚨 Nick Dargie describes how harrowing it was to the fake media dealing with the lone juror The lone juror got fed up after being continously badgered by this wimp juror So he grabbed the exercise band Clancy used to strangle her kids and wrapped it around an empty water bottle.... and pulled it tight to show them why he wouldn't budge.... that's f'n hero s'hit in my book Bravo πŸ‘ once again to the lone juror who looked evil in the Lindsay Clancy and the other 11 jurors and stood up for those 3 kids

    16K2.7K44091345K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20269.6x their median

    Is everyone down with this πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/4Rjm9RlzK4

    12K1.7K3.8K47693K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 529K followers, an engagement rate of 0.36%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 13.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is @Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate on X?
@Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@Chicago1Ray) has an engagement rate of 0.36%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 528,595 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.36%, @Chicago1Ray πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Chicago1Ray have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Chicago1Ray post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going