Back to @ChelseaFrance's profile

Chelsea FR engagement report

@ChelseaFrance - 247K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.062%
of 247K followers
Per impression
1.95%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
152
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 167x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #enzofiles.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chelsea FR's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, Chelsea FR sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 230 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026167x their median

    Quand tu va sur YouTube et que ça te propose des résumés et des débriefs de la défaite de ton club https://t.co/wyNge8PsPm

    23K2.5K2672259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202682x their median

    🚨Arsenal’s ball assistant took a match ball away from Estêvão to waste time in the 91st minute https://t.co/b6zG7J8mUh

    12K5792171403.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202611x their median

    " Chelsea joue contre qui ce soir ? " ON JOUE CONTRE LEEDS https://t.co/lSptsueTNj

    1.6K94111056K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20246.5x their median

    L’équipe de Chelsea France tient à exprimer ses pensées et son soutien envers le peuple libanais et tous les autres peuples du monde qui souffrent d’oppression. Ces images détestables doivent cesser d’être passées sous silence et nous nous devons de les dénoncer. 🇵🇸🇱🇧🇨🇩💙💙💙

    7731951352.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.9x their median

    Les ptits reufs @ChelseaFrance allez me chercher une canette pomme cassis svp

    83442137178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.8x their median

    🚨🚨 OFFICIEL ! ENZO FERNANDEZ 🇦🇷 NE FAIT PAS PARTIE DES 30 NOMMÉS AU BALLON D’OR 🌕 !!! ❌ https://t.co/AKnoSX6TMf

    544378464120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.6x their median

    Les fans de Chelsea ont craqué mdrrr https://t.co/IIAQ78JFse

    39393194749K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.9x their median

    ⚠️ APPEL À TEMOIN ⚠️ Ne les oublions pas ! Quatre hommes sont toujours portés disparus depuis plusieurs jours . Si vous avez des informations qui pourraient aider à les retrouver n'hésitez pas à le faire savoir. Voir tweets si dessous 👇

    3903511683K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.5x their median

    C’est le retour de la Ligue des Champions ce soir https://t.co/OChMR2RKi0

    346216314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.4x their median

    Le magnifique but de Cole Palmer contre Brighton a été élue but du mois d’août de Chelsea. [@ChelseaFC] https://t.co/6x8gONJBOk

    35018018.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#enzofiles

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 167x its own typical post.

What is Chelsea FR's engagement rate on X?
Chelsea FR (@ChelseaFrance) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,210 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, Chelsea FR sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChelseaFrance have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChelseaFrance post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going